About Marissa Mayer
The Truth About Marissa Mayer: An Unauthorized
Biography
Yahoo CEO Marissa Mayer Got Paid YesterdayYahoo Is Paying Katie Couric $6 Million A Year, Says TMZMarissa Mayer Hints At One Way Yahoo Could Fix Email
On the
morning of Thursday, July 12, 2012, Yahoo's interim CEO, Ross Levinsohn, still
believed he was going to be named permanent CEO of the company.
He had just
one meeting to go.
That
meeting was a board meeting to be held that day in a large conference room on
the first floor of Yahoo's Sunnyvale, Calif., headquarters. Yahoo called the
room "Phish Food" — a funky room with lots of glass and white leather
couches and chairs.
The
agenda for the meeting: Levinsohn was going to brief the directors on his plan
for Yahoo, should he be named permanent CEO.
Levinsohn
walked into the room; all of his top executives followed.
There
was Jim Heckman, Levinsohn's top dealmaker, who'd spent months negotiating a
huge deal with Microsoft. There was Shashi Seth, Yahoo's top product management
executive, already planning a long-needed update to Yahoo Mail and the Yahoo
homepage. There was chief financial officer Tim Morse, who'd just completed a
critical, company-saving deal to sell a portion of Yahoo subsidiary Alibaba.
There was Mickie Rosen, a News Corp. veteran whom Levinsohn had hired to run
Yahoo's media business. And there was Mollie Spillman, whom he'd just made CMO.
Heckman,
Seth, Morse, Rosen, Spillman, and handful of others sat off to the side.
All of
them believed that the meeting was a formality — that Levinsohn was going to
get the job.
They
had good reason to be confident. For the two months prior, the chairman of
Yahoo's board, Fred Amoroso, had made it clear that he was going to do
everything he could to make sure Levinsohn and his team would be running the
company for the foreseeable future.
Amoroso
told Levinsohn this in private. He told Yahoo employees this during an
all-hands meeting in May. He'd even joined a sales call to express support for
Levinsohn to Yahoo advertisers — an oddly hands-on move for a chairman.
In
June, Amoroso helped Levinsohn recruit a high-profile Google executive named
Michael Barrett into Yahoo. During the recruiting process, Amoroso promised
Barrett that Levinsohn's "interim" title was only temporary — that it
was safe to leave Google.
Levinsohn
had another reason to be hopeful: For the past few months, he'd been speaking
with two of Yahoo's most important new directors, Dan Loeb and Michael Wolf,
almost every day. As important as it was for Levinsohn to have Amoroso's
support, he needed Loeb's more. Loeb ran a hedge fund called Third Point, which
owned more than 5 percent of Yahoo and had, only months before, forced the
resignation of Yahoo's previous CEO. Wolf was an important ally for Levinsohn
to have, too. Wolf, a former president of MTV, was consulting for Third Point
on media investments when Loeb asked him to join the Yahoo board and lead its
search committee for a new CEO.
Levinsohn
began his presentation. It was going to be a doozy, as he planned to seriously
alter the direction of Yahoo.
He
wanted it to stop competing with technology businesses like Google and
Microsoft and focus entirely on competing with media and content businesses
like Disney, Time Warner, and News Corporation. As part of this transition,
Levinsohn wanted to spin off, sell, or shut down several Yahoo business units.
He said doing so would reduce Yahoo's head count by as many as 10,000
employees, and increase its earnings before taxes and interest by as much as 50
percent.
In
fact, Levinsohn announced during his presentation that he and his team had
already started down this road.
Levinsohn
told the board that, under his direction, Heckman had begun negotiating a deal
with Microsoft to exchange Yahoo's search business for Microsoft's portal,
MSN.com, and large payments in cash. Levinsohn and Heckman had also been
talking with Google executive Henrique De Castro about turning over some of
Yahoo's advertising inventory. There was also talk of unloading some of Yahoo's
enterprise-facing advertising-technology businesses into a joint venture
involving New York-based ad tech startup AppNexus.
Heidi
Gutman/CNBC
Dan
Loeb controlled 5 percent of Yahoo and joined the board after a bloody proxy
fight.
It was
during this part of his presentation that Levinsohn began to feel the permanent
Yahoo CEO job slipping away.
Others
in the room got the same sinking feeling.
Wolf,
the man in charge of the committee tasked with hiring a permanent CEO, began to
question the wisdom of the deal.
Wolf
asked, in a loud voice with a sharp tone, "I understand why this is good
for Microsoft, but why is it good for Yahoo?"
Harry
Wilson, another director brought onto the board by Loeb, joined Wolf in his
criticism of the deal as "short-sighted."
Their
cross-examination of the deal eventually boiled down to one question: Had
Levinsohn and Heckman made any irreversible commitments to either Microsoft or
Google?
It was
obvious to several people in the room that Wolf and Wilson wanted to make sure
another candidate for the CEO job would not be forced to follow through on a
deal they had not negotiated.
This
was a bad sign for Levinsohn's candidacy.
But
Wilson and Wolf's loud complaints about the Microsoft deal weren't the worst
sign for Levinsohn's chances; Loeb's behavior during the meeting was.
Loeb is
the suited, slick, and handsome Wall Street type. He wears his salt and pepper
hair short and messy-on-purpose. He's actually from Southern California, and
sometimes he puts off a surfer vibe.
During
Levinsohn's presentation, Loeb looked bored. He wasn't paying full attention.
As the interim CEO talked, Loeb stood at the back of the room and played with
his BlackBerry.
One
person in the room remembers watching Loeb texting for a while and then,
"during the most important part of the presentation," getting up and
going to the bathroom for ten minutes.
This
person remembers thinking: "Oh, OK. Sorry, Ross, you're not CEO
anymore."
After
the meeting, Barrett, the Google executive Amoroso had helped Levinsohn poach,
called Levinsohn to ask how it went. Levinsohn told him he no longer felt like
he was getting the job.
But who
was?
That
night, Levinsohn flew to Sun Valley, Idaho, where investment bank Allen &
Co. holds an annual retreat for big-name media and technology executives.
Over
the weekend, Levinsohn played a guessing game with venture capitalist Marc
Andreessen, Square CEO Jack Dorsey, and Twitter CEO Dick Costolo. With each of
them, Levinsohn and the other Silicon Valley bigwigs ran through a long list of
names, trying to figure out who might be getting the job Levinsohn had so hoped
for. For each name they came up with, they came up with a persuasive reason why
that person could not be it.
Whom
had Wolf and Loeb so clearly already decided on?
Finally,
late Sunday night, Levinsohn got a call from a friend of his at Google.
This
person asked: Had Levinsohn heard that Marissa Mayer had interviewed for the
Yahoo job the Wednesday prior?
Levinsohn
realized everything all at once.
Levinsohn
now knew who Yahoo's next CEO would be.
Soon, so
would everyone else.
On
Monday, July 16, four days after Levinsohn's last board meeting, Yahoo made it
official: Thirty-seven-year-old Marissa Mayer was Yahoo's new CEO.
The
board had indeed already made Mayer an offer by the time Levinsohn went into that
final meeting to present his plan for Yahoo.
After
the news broke in public, Levinsohn admitted to friends that he was
disappointed. He had really wanted the job, and believed he would have done
very well with it. He also felt bad for the team he put in place, who would now
have to report to an unfamiliar leader.
But
Levinsohn was also at peace. If he had to lose out to someone, at least he lost
out to an icon.
Flickr/Fortune Live Media
Marissa
Mayer
There
is no one else in the world like Marissa Mayer.
Now 38
years old, she is a wife, a mother, an engineer, and the CEO of a
30-billion-dollar company. She is a woman in an industry dominated by men. In a
world where corporations are expected to serve shareholders before anyone else,
she is obsessed with putting the customer experience first.
Worth
at least $300 million, she isn't afraid to show off her wealth. Steve Jobs may
have lived in a small, suburban home with an apple tree out front, but Marissa
Mayer lives in the penthouse of San Francisco's Four Seasons Hotel.
While
rival CEOs like Mark Zuckerberg of Facebook and Larry Page of Google wear
flip-flops, hoodies, and T-shirts, Mayer wears Oscar De La Renta on the red
carpet.
Mayer
calls herself a geek, but she doesn't look the part. With her blonde hair, blue
eyes, and glamorous style, she has Hollywood-actress good looks.
Young,
powerful, rich, and brilliant, Mayer is a role model for millions of women. And
yet, unlike Facebook's chief operating officer, Sheryl Sandberg, Mayer resists
calling herself a feminist. She even infuriated working mothers across the world
when she banned Yahoo employees from working from home.
Widely
admired by the public at large, Mayer has many enemies within her industry.
They say she is robotic, stuck up, and absurd in her obsession with detail.
They say her obsession with the user experience masks a disdain for the
money-making side of the technology industry.
There
is some truth to what they say.
And
yet, a year after Mayer took over Yahoo, the company's stock price was up 100
percent. Engineers wanted to work for Yahoo again. More importantly, so did
sought-after startup CEOs like Tumblr founder David Karp, who agreed to sell
his company to Yahoo for $1.1 billion.
Questions persist
Most
CEOs of Mayer's stature — people running multi-billion-dollar public companies
the size of Yahoo — are gregarious, out-going types — the kind of person who
might have been a politician if the world of business and money hadn't
beckoned. Baby-kissers. Back-slappers. Schmoozers. Mayer is not that type.
Peers from every stage of her life — from her early childhood days to her first
year at Yahoo — say Mayer is a shy, socially awkward person.
How in
the world has she overcome such a disadvantage to rise so far, so fast?
To a
public casually interested in her career, Mayer's career before Yahoo — spent entirely
at Google — is remembered as one success after another. It wasn't.
Mayer
started off at Google spectacularly well, designing its homepage, creating its
product management structure, and becoming the face of the company. She became
one of the most powerful people at one of the world's most powerful companies.
But
then, suddenly, her peers were promoted past her. Responsibility for the look
and feel of Google's entire suite of consumer-facing products, including the
Google homepage, was taken away from her. She was moved to a less important
product: Google Maps. She was removed from a council of executives that met
with Google's CEO. To industry insiders, this sudden change was a demotion for
Mayer. Was it actually? If it was, why did it happen? How did Mayer recover?
Mayer's
move to the top of Yahoo during the summer of 2012 was a shock for almost
everyone — including the people who convinced her to do it. How did the board
pull it off?
Then
there's the biggest question about Mayer: Can she save Yahoo?
Illustration
by Mike Nudelman
Marissa
Ann Mayer was born on May 30, 1975 to parents Margaret Mayer, a Finnish art
teacher and homemaker, and Michael Mayer, an environmental engineer.
She
grew up in Wausau, Wis., with a sports-playing brother, Mason Mayer. It was a
middle-class upbringing. She went to public schools and worked a summer job as
a grocery clerk, but her family had enough time and money to enroll her in
countless activities.
Most
press photos of Mayer today show her on a stage, speaking with an interviewer
in front of a large crowd or a TV audience. She's usually wearing a designer
dress — probably from her favorite designer, Oscar De La Renta — and looking
strong, confident, and in charge of the moment.
But
Mayer, now 38 years old, wasn't always so larger-than-life. She describes the
child and teenage version of herself as "painfully shy."
Owen
Thomas, Business Insider
Yahoo
CEO Marissa Mayer at the 2013 Goldman Sachs Technology and Internet Conference.
Indeed, the Mayer you see in photos today is not the one
remembered by the peers she grew up with in the small town of Wausau. For one,
her style involved more T-shirts, sweaters, and jeans — nice clothes, but
nothing flashy. And while Mayer has always presented well in front of an
audience, her peers don't remember her as extroverted or larger-than-life.
One of
those peers is named Brian Jojade. He took Advanced Math with Mayer in 8th
grade. He remembers Mayer as someone who hated social attention. Once, Jojade
called the local radio station and told them it was Mayer's birthday. He asked
the DJ to read her name out on air. Jojade, who had a small crush on Mayer,
figured hearing her name would make her laugh. It didn't. "She wasn't
amused at all. You could just tell it wasn't fun for her."
Otherwise,
Jojade's overriding memory of Mayer is as the "professional" girl who
sat in the front of the classroom and "always worked hard and made sure no
matter what she was going to do, it was going to get done right."
Mayer's
Wausau West High School classmate Elize Bazter says she best remembers Mayer as
the girl who was "kind to everyone" but would dodge conversations on
her way to go study somewhere else.
Wausau
West had a class schedule system where, instead of periods, the day was broken
up into 20-minute "mods." Classes lasted for 40 minutes or an hour.
That meant there were 20-minute breaks during everyone's day. Bazter said most
upperclassmen would use the time to congregate in the school's commons.
"You
could study," says Bazter, "but mostly it was talking and eating and
gathering with your friends."
Wausau
West High Yearbook 1993
Mayer
introduces the 1992 homecoming court
Not for teenage Marissa Mayer.
"She
would be the person to come down, get something to eat from the kitchen or the
vending machines, and then she would go to the library or the science lab to
study. She wouldn't be the one to stay and sit there and converse for 20
minutes."
Bazter
says the image she thinks of when she remembers Mayer is of her "in
school, books in hand, walking down the hallway to do something else."
None of
this is to say that Mayer had a sad, lonely time growing up in Wausau. She
didn't. Mayer is fond of Wausau.
When
she got married to a San Francisco banker named Zachary Bogue in 2009, she held
two ceremonies: One was in California, and a second at her childhood church,
Immanuel Lutheran in Wausau.
As a
kid, Mayer's peers in school had no idea what to make of her. Likewise, Mayer
says she was "painfully shy" around them. But teachers? Teachers were
Mayer's kind of people.
In
2010, Mayer returned to her hometown to be inducted into the Wausau School
District's "Alumni Hall of Fame." At a luncheon held in honor of her
and 25 teachers retiring that year, Mayer gave a speech that the school
district recorded in a video.
In the
video, Mayer stands at a podium in a blue designer dress with a yellow corsage
pinned on. She begins the speech by thanking her teachers, "each of whom
changed my life forever."
Then
she begins to list her teachers by name. As she does — "... Mr. Freedly,
Mrs. Stay, Mr. Flanagan ..." — you can see on Mayer's face how important
these people were to her growing up. About six names in, the timber of Mayer's
voice actually breaks toward a sob, and she has to catch herself with a breath
and a small gulp. She can't stop her eyes from swelling with held-back tears,
though.
Most
teenagers fondly recall sneaking into high school their senior year for a prank
— setting chickens loose or toilet-papering the hallways. Mayer once snuck into
her AP Lit teacher's classroom to decorate it like a jungle because she was so
inspired by the teacher's lesson on "Heart of Darkness."
Mayer's
fifth-grade teacher at Stettin Elementary, Wayne Flanagan, remembers that Mayer
refused to leave his classroom the last day of that school year. She did not
want to go to middle school.
She
told Flanagan she was worried that she wouldn't make it there, with all the new
kids and teachers she'd have to meet.
Flanagan
says Mayer the little girl was "a home person; she liked to be safe and
know where she's at."
Flanagan,
who says it was obvious even then how far Mayer would go, told the reluctant
little girl, "Oh, I think you're going to make it fine."
Still,
she wouldn't go. Eventually Flanagan called Mayer's mother to let her know where
her daughter was.
Certainly
the people Mayer spent most of her childhood with were a particular kind of
nurturing, mentoring adult: coaches, teachers, counselors, and instructors.
As a
little kid, she was in Brownies. She took piano lessons. She played volleyball
and basketball. She went to swimming and skiing lessons. She took ballet for as
many as 35 hours a week during middle school and high school. Her mother says
ballet taught her "criticism and discipline, poise and confidence."
In high
school Mayer was also on the curling team. She was a "pompom" girl
and a debater. She was on the precision dance team.
Mayer
was so busy in part because her mother, Margaret Mayer, pushed her to be.
Flanagan,
the fifth-grade teacher, says Mayer's mother would frequently stop by school to
check on her daughter's progress. He says he "got to be good friends"
with the Mayers. "They were concerned about her and that she was making
the right progress. And she was. And she knew that — that her parents were supportive
of her."
In one
way, Mayer owes her career to the relationships she was able to form with
teachers.
Statistics
show that many high school girls do not feel like they belong in math or
science classes. In 2003, 84 percent of high schoolers who took the SAT and said
they wanted to major in computer science were boys — obviously, that means just
16 percent were women.
Wausau
West High School Yearbook
Mayer
was on Wausau West's state championship winning debate team.
Mayer says she never felt that bias at Wausau West.
"It
wasn't until I was a professional woman mentoring other girls in math and
science that I learned that openly liking math and science is unusual for
girls. It's actually considered far too nerdy and far too much for the boys.
"Wausau
schools were so supportive that I never felt strange for a second about
pursuing math and science and being good in them."
Mayer
credits her teachers for helping her become less shy.
They
did this by showing Mayer that she could "organize" more than just
her backpack, desk, and homework — that she could organize people, as their
leader.
Mayer's
childhood piano teacher, Joanne Beckman, remembers Mayer being very different
from other children in that she was someone who "watched people" in
order to "figure out why they were doing what they were doing."
"A
lot of kids that age are very interested in themselves," Beckman says,
"She was looking at other people."
By
"looking" at her teachers, figuring out why they were doing what they
were doing, Mayer overcame her "painful" shyness with peers by taking
on the teacher's role.
Even
when she was in fifth grade, Mr. Flanagan could see the pedagogical side of
Mayer developing. He thought she would become a teacher someday.
In high
school, Mayer took a leadership position in every club she joined. She became
president of the Spanish club, treasurer of Key Club, and Captain of the debate
team.
One of
her closest friends from Wausau, Abigail Garvey Wilson, says, "When
Marissa became captain of the pompom squad, she wasn't in with that clique of
girls, but she won them over in three ways."
"First:
sheer talent. Marissa could choreograph a great routine. Second: hard work. She
scheduled practices lasting hours to make sure everyone was synchronized. And
third: fairness. With Marissa in charge, the best dancers made the team."
In
1993, Mayer applied to, and was accepted into, 10 schools, including Harvard,
Yale, Duke, and Northwestern.
To
decide which one she would go to, Mayer created a spreadsheet, weighing
variables for each.
She
picked Stanford. Her plan was to become a brain doctor — a profession that
doesn't draw much on the leadership traits Mayer was quickly developing.
But
soon enough, Mayer would find herself once again overcoming her shyness by
taking charge of a room full of peers, pushing them to work for hours.
Soon
enough, she would find herself at the front of a Stanford classroom,
interacting with people in the way that came most natural to her — teaching
them.
Teaching
was her calling.
Illustration by Mike Nudelman
The summer
before Marissa Mayer went to Stanford, she began asking herself a question that
would guide her through college and for the rest of her life.
What
does Zune think?
That
summer, Mayer attended the National Youth Science Camp in West Virginia. It was
nerd heaven. Picture science labs housed in wooden cabins shaded by trees.
Mayer especially loved one experiment where they mixed water and corn starch to
make a sloppy goo-like substance that seemed to defy gravity.
One
day, a post-doctoral student from Yale named Zune Nguyen spoke to the campers
as a guest lecturer. He stunned all the smart kids in the room with puzzles and
brainteasers. For days, the campers couldn't stop talking about his talk.
Finally,
one of Mayer's counselors had enough.
"You
know, you have it all wrong," the counselor said to Mayer and the campers.
"It's not what Zune knows, it's how Zune thinks."
The
counselor said that what made Nguyen so amazing wasn't the facts that he knew,
but rather how he approached the world and how he thought about problems. The
counselor said the most remarkable thing about Nguyen was that you could put
him in an entirely new environment or present him with an entirely new problem,
and within a matter of minutes he would be asking the right questions and
making the right observations.
From
that moment on, the phrase: "It's not what Zune knows, but how Zune
thinks," stuck with Mayer as a sort of personal guiding proverb.
In the
fall, Mayer went to Stanford and began taking pre-med classes. She planned to
become a doctor. But by the end of her freshman year, she was sick of it.
"I
was just doing too many flashcards," she says. "They were easy for
me, but it was just a lot of memorization."
She
says she wanted to find a major "that really made me think" — that
would train her to "think critically, and become a great
problem-solver." She also wanted to "study how people think, how they
reason, how they express themselves."
"I
had this nagging voice in my head saying 'It's not what Zune knows, but how
Zune thinks.'"
Mayer
began to answer the voice in her head — and find a course of study that helped
her learn how to think — when she took an introductory computer science class:
CS105.
Mayer
was engrossed by the challenge of programming — taking a problem and using her
mind to solve it.
During
the semester, she entered a class-wide design contest for extra credit. Calling
on the same part of her brain that made her such an excellent pompom
choreographer, Mayer made a screensaver featuring exploding fireworks. In a
class of 300, Mayer came in second.
The
design was good enough that Mayer's CS105 professor, Eric Roberts, would also
use an adaptation of the screen saver as an assignment for the next several
years.
Stanford
professor Eric Roberts says Mayer was an incredible teacher.
Roberts was also impressed enough with Mayer's exploding
fireworks that he invited her and a few other top finishers over for dinner at
his house. He became her mentor, as once again, Mayer bonded with a teacher.
Mayer
had also found her major.
Mayer
opted for symbolic systems — a combination of disciplines straight out of Zune
Nguyen's head: Linguistics, philosophy, cognitive psychology, and computer
science classes.
Symbolic
systems has become a famous Stanford major in Silicon Valley. Besides Mayer,
other alumni include LinkedIn co-founder Reid Hoffman; former senior vice
president of iOS software at Apple, Scott Forstall; and Instagram co-founder
Mike Krieger.
Mayer's
teacherly leadership streak came out in a big way when she took Philosophy
160A, then considered a "weed-out course" for prospective symbolic
systems majors.
During
Philosophy 160A, the students break into study groups of a half dozen or so
students, and the groups are assigned problem sets. Mayer's group — just like
all the others — put off doing their problem sets until the day before they
were due.
So that
semester at Stanford was full of all-nighters for Mayer and her Philosophy 160A
group.
Mayer
ended up in a group that included Josh Elman, now a venture capitalist. Looking
back on those study sessions, Elman remembers "times when people in the
group were bouncing off the walls."
He
says, "Marissa was always like, 'OK, back to work. Let's get this done.'
She was focused on making sure we got the right answer quickly."
"It
felt like she was the smartest student in the room — and the most serious. You
always knew those two things about her. Very smart. Very serious."
The
social dynamic of the group was typical for Mayer. As usual, she commanded the
room — organized the group's work in an all-business fashion — but was
otherwise shy, and somewhat reclusive.
In the
years ahead, this combination — Mayer's willingness to be authoritative and
demanding the way a teacher would, with a "painful" fear or
reluctance of being personal — would cause problems for Mayer.
One
Stanford classmate interpreted Mayer's shyness as being "kind of stuck
up."
"She
would do her work and then leave. When other people would stay and hang out and
have pizza, she'd just be out of there because the work is done."
Indeed,
Mayer doesn't seem to have had a very active social life in college.
One
person who lived in her dorm said she appeared to always be "down to
business" and "not much for socializing."
"She
wasn't one of those people into making new friends around the dorm. She was
always doing something more important than just chilling."
The
simplest explanation for Mayer's social behavior at Stanford remains that Mayer
was, as she has said many times, "painfully shy."
Later
at Stanford, Mayer found herself in a group setting that was less social, more
comfortable, and more familiar for her. As an upperclassman in symbolic
systems, she was tapped to teach a class.
She
took to it naturally.
Computer
science professor Eric Roberts, still Mayer's mentor, supervised her teaching.
He says she was "unusually good at it" and "extremely
effective."
After
Mayer taught a course in the spring, Roberts took a survey of her students. The
results were astounding: They loved her — even if she did sometimes talk
"a mile a minute."
Roberts
asked Mayer to stick around Stanford to teach another class over the summer;
she readily agreed.
"She
loved teaching," says Roberts.
Of
course she did. Stanford students called her "stuck up" when they
were her classmates. But when she was their teacher, they thought she was
great.
WATCH: Marissa Mayer teaches a
class at Stanford
|
Mayer
excelled the rest of her years as an undergraduate at Stanford. After she got
her bachelor's degree, she stayed at the school to get a master's in computer
science, with a speciality in artificial intelligence.
As
graduate school drew to a close, word got out about Mayer's teaching ability.
She
soon faced a choice.
Should
she become a teacher, and step full time into a role that had always suited her
so well?
Or
should she challenge herself and work somewhere in the technology industry?
Taking
A 2 percent Chance On Google
When
people ask Mayer why she joined Google after getting her masters in symbolic
systems at Stanford, she likes to tell them her "Laura Beckman
story." It's about the daughter of her middle school piano teacher, Joanne
Beckman.
Mayer
begins: "Laura tried out for the volleyball team her junior year at high
school. At the end of the tryouts, she was given a hard choice: bench on
varsity, or start on JV.
"Most
people, when they're faced with this choice, would choose to play - and they'll
pick JV. Laura did the opposite. She chose varsity, and she benched the whole
season.
"But
then an amazing thing happened. Senior year she tried out and she made varsity
as a starter, and all the JV starters from the previous year benched their
whole senior year.
"I
remember asking her: 'How did you know to choose varsity?'
"And
she said, 'I just knew that if I got to practice with the better players every
day, I would become a much better player, even if I didn't get to play in any
of the games.'"
The moral
of Mayer's story is that it's always better to surround yourself with the best
people so that they will challenge you and you will grow.
"My
quest to find, and be surrounded by, smart people is what brought me to
Google," she says.
And
that's the overriding reason why Mayer joined Google. But quests for
self-improvement aside, it's also true that Mayer almost missed her chance to
join the company that would make her rich and powerful someday.
Late on
a Friday in mid-April of her last year at Stanford, Mayer sat at her computer,
eating pasta and reading emails.
She
already had 12 job offers to choose from, and wasn't looking for any more hard
choices.
So when
yet another pitch from a recruiter popped up in her inbox, she tapped on her
keyboard's delete key to get rid of it.
Only,
she missed.
Instead
of hitting delete, Mayer hit the space bar and opened the email.
That
email's subject line: "Work at Google?"
Larry
Page and Sergey Brin
Mayer read the email and remembered a conversation she had with
Eric Roberts who was still a mentor years after she took his computer science
class for non-majors. The prior fall, Roberts listened to Mayer talk about the
recommendation engine she'd built, and then told her she should meet with a
pair of Ph.D. students who were working on similar stuff. Their names: Sergey
Brin and Larry Page.
Mayer
realized that Google was their startup. Trusting Roberts' recommendation, she
replied to an email she had meant to delete, writing that she'd like an
interview.
She got
one, and met with engineer Craig Silverstein. Silverstein blew her away with
his smarts. In the Laura Beckman analogy, he was varsity.
Google
offered Mayer a job. She seriously considered it.
Her reservations
were that she had planned on taking a job at consulting firm McKinsey, where
her clients would be Silicon Valley companies.
Google
was a riskier career choice. In her typical, precise way, she'd crunched the
data and had decided that the company only had a 2 percent chance of
succeeding.
Also,
some small part of Mayer was worried about Google's weird name, which she
imagined would be the punch line of family jokes for years to come.
She got
over it.
"The
turning point for me," she says, "was realizing that I would learn
more at Google, trying to build a company, regardless of whether we failed or
succeeded, than I would at any of the other companies I had offers from."
For the
next 13 years, Marissa Mayer worked at Google.
Illustration
by Mike Nudelman
Marissa
Mayer joined Google as a programmer and rose to become the executive in charge
of the way Google search and many other popular Google products looked to Web
users.
She
became a senior vice president, with thousands of Google employees reporting to
her and hundreds of millions of people around the world using products she
helped build. The job made her worth hundreds of millions of dollars. But then
something strange happened to Mayer, and people in the industry wondered what
went wrong.
Google
Mayer
during her early Google days.
Google
in its early days was a fun place to work, energized by incredible success and
perks like free food. But it was also a grinding, stressful environment.
On
Mayer's second day at Google in 1999, she went to the kitchen for a snack at
around 11 A.M. There, she bumped into Larry Page, then CEO of the company. He
was standing in a corner.
"I'm
hiding," he said. "The site is down. It's all gone horribly
awry."
He was
exaggerating, of course. Google was actually doing too well at the moment.
In
1999, Google.com was a cleaner-looking and faster search engine than any of the
others on the Web, and it was rapidly taking share from older search engines
like AltaVista and Lycos. In fact, the site was down that day because Google
had just signed a deal with Netscape to handle search queries from
Netscape.com. Google only had 300 computers serving search results, and it
asked Netscape to send just a fraction of its traffic. Netscape ignored the
request and sent all of its users.
Down
went Google.com.
Google
went back online that day, but only after hours of work from Mayer,
Silverstein, and her new colleagues. She went home at 3 a.m.
Perhaps
because of long nights like that one, Mayer and Page eventually grew very
close. At one point during Mayer's early years at Google, she and Page started
dating.
Long
hours would prove the norm for Mayer. During her first two years at Google, she
worked 100 hours a week as a programmer.
Mayer
thrived working the tough hours. She only needed four hours of sleep a night,
and when she was awake, she would work harder than anyone. She found a niche at
Google: guardian of the clean, easy-to-use look and feel of Google products.
She obsessed over pixels; their hue, shade, and placement. She co-authored a
handful of patents, including an important one for Google: "Graphical user
interface for a universal search engine."
By
2005, Mayer moved into management, overseeing the look and feel of Google's
most important products.
She was
very good at it.
Google
Mayer
in 2005.
During her first several years at Google, Mayer had been able to
continue teaching at Stanford. She taught 3,000 undergraduates by the time she
was promoted, so the part of managing that has to do with leading, teaching,
and organizing came easy to her. She enjoyed working with younger Google
employees so much that she even started teaching classes at Google.
She
created a mentorship program called "APM" which stood for
"associated product manager." Each year Mayer would select junior
Google employees for the APM program, give them assignments, and teach them
classes. Then, at the end of the program, Mayer would take the entire APM
"class" on a weeklong trip abroad to Google offices around the globe.
When it
came to developing Google products, Mayer had a bigger challenge.
Mayer
has never been someone who easily relates with others. That's why people call
her robotic or "stuck up." This trait is why people sometimes walk
out of meetings with her feeling deeply insulted by a perceived slight.
But
being in charge of how Google products should look, Mayer's job was, basically,
to relate with Google's millions of users. How would she do that?
In the
end, it proved to be an advantage for Mayer that empathy doesn't come naturally
to her. It forced her to be intentional about figuring out what users want and
how they behave.
She
came up with two clever methods of relating.
Mayer
at the height of her power at Google.
The first is that she would recreate the technological
circumstances of her users in her own life. Mayer went without broadband for
years in her home, refusing to install it until it was also installed in the
majority of American homes. She carried an iPhone at Google, which makes
Android phones, because so did most mobile Web users.
Mayer's
second method was to lean on data. She would track, survey, and measure every
user interaction with Google products, and then use that data to design and
re-design.
Mayer's
design-by-numbers approach to product development was not always popular.
Famously,
a lead designer named Doug Bowman quit Google over it.
In a
farewell blog post, Bowman wrote: "... a team at Google couldn't decide
between two blues, so they're testing 41 shades between each blue to see which
one performs better. I had a recent debate over whether a border should be 3, 4
or 5 pixels wide, and was asked to prove my case. I can't operate in an
environment like that. I've grown tired of debating such minuscule design
decisions. There are more exciting design problems in this world to
tackle."
Bowman went to Twitter.
Mayer's
obsession with data-driven design would only gain more and louder critics over
the years. But Mayer's methods also made her one of the Internet's most
effective design and product development leaders during her years at Google.
People at Google credit her with the success of not just Google search, but
also many others, including Gmail, Google Maps, and Google News.
Google
co-founder Sergey Brin says: "Marissa makes the decisions she feels are
right, and history proves that she probably calls it right."
San Francisco Magazine
Julian Guthrie profiled Marissa Mayer in San Francisco
Magazine's March 2008 issue.
Fame and Glory
As
Google became a world-famous company, Mayer began to get attention from the
media. Newsweek called her one of the "10 Tech Leaders of the
Future." Business 2.0 named her to the "Silicon Valley Dream
Team." Now-defunct technology news site Red Herring said Mayer was one of
"15 Women to Watch."
Then,
in 2004, Google went public. Its stock price soared. This made Mayer and
hundreds of her colleagues rich in an instant. The media's fascination with
Google kicked up several notches. Mayer, in charge of the look of Google's most
important product, and a rare photogenic woman in the technology industry, was
a natural subject of the media's fixation.
Mayer
also boosted her public profile by deciding to spend her new riches
conspicuously. She bought the $5 million penthouse suite at the Four Seasons in
San Francisco, and another home closer to Google's Mountain View campus. She
started throwing fabulous parties at both, jumping feet first into San
Francisco's high-end social scene. Guests at her homes would see expensive
original artwork from famous artists, like the 400-piece glass installation
Mayer commissioned from Dale Chihuly.
Mayer
did not mind the attention. In fact, she asked Google public relations staff to
get her more of it, but in the right outlets.
Mayer's
eagerness to be known by the public may appear to contradict her claim that she
suffers from shyness. It doesn't. She describes her shyness as a need to
withdraw from social situations almost as soon as she enters them. Being
featured in a glossy magazine does not require her to interact with every
reader, so she probably doesn't have as much anxiety about it as she does
making small talk at a party.
Plus,
there is such a thing as overcompensation.
Mayer
in Vogue in 2009
By the end of the decade, Vogue magazine would profile Mayer,
and describe her as "the 34-year-old mega-millionaire, Oscar de la
Renta-obsessed, computer-programming Google executive who lives in a penthouse
atop the Four Seasons."
Outside
Google, her star was never brighter. Inside Google, however, where wealth was
supposed to be quietly spent, and engineers were supposed to rule, Mayer would
soon be under siege.
Demoted
At the
end of 2010 and beginning of 2011, Marissa Mayer's remarkable career suddenly
lost momentum.
First,
in Oct. 2010, Mayer was removed from the top of Google's search organization
and put in charge of Google Maps and other "local" products.
Technically,
this was a lateral move, if not a promotion, because Mayer retained her vice
president title and she was, at the same time, given a seat on Google's
Operating Committee — then CEO Eric Schmidt's roundtable of top executives from
the company.
In
reality, it was a demotion. Mayer was no longer in charge of what Google's most
important product looked like or how it worked. At Google, there is search,
which generates nearly all of the company's revenues and profits, and then
there is everything else. Running Google search, Mayer was managing the most
important product at the world's most important Internet company. Running
Google Maps, she was not.
Still,
there was the mitigating factor that Mayer was on Google's Operating Committee,
and she therefore reported directly to CEO Eric Schmidt.
That
went away too.
By
Justin Sullivan/Getty Images
Google
CEO Larry Page did not put Mayer on his executive team.
In December 2010, co-founder Larry Page announced that a decade
after giving the CEO job up to Eric Schmidt, he was going to take it back.
When
Page formally took control of Google in April 2011, he dissolved the Operating Committee
and created a new council of executives who would report directly to him. This
group came to be known as the "L-Team." Mayer was not named to it.
Then,
to make matters worse for Mayer, Page put another Google executive, Jeff Huber,
in charge of "Geo/Local," the group Mayer had been tasked to run only
months before. Mayer now reported to Huber, who joined Google in 2003 — four
years after her.
Mayer's
loss of authority was felt across the company. One former colleague says that
prior to 2010, Mayer was always able to "get what she needed" from
management.
"If
her boss [Google senior vice president of product] Jonathan Rosenberg didn't
approve of something — didn't give her head count or didn't give her an
acquisition or whatever — she'd just go right above him and get what she
needed."
That
now stopped.
"She
would try to do something and HR would say that's not the kind of thing she
could do anymore."
"That
whole paradigm broke apart."
Another
former colleague says, "When I first turned up, Marissa was very powerful
at Google. Marissa used to issue edicts and everyone did them. Over time that
proved not to be so true."
Another
way to track the rise and fall of Mayer at Google is to look at the company's
own, public list of executives in the "About Google" section of
Google.com.
In
November 2005, Mayer's name and bio finally appeared on Google's management
page. By May 2011, her name was off the site.
What
happened to Marissa Mayer's career?
One
explanation is that Mayer's career stalled as 2010 ended and 2011 began because
that is exactly when Larry Page decided he was going to become Google CEO
again.
Because
Mayer and Page had dated years before, some wonder if Page decided he could
never allow Mayer to report directly to him because it would be unethical or
show favoritism.
Everyone
at Google had long known about the relationship, and no one ever made it an
issue — it was too taboo to bring up.
One
Googler explains: "Google is one of those places where, like a cult, there
are things that are OK to talk about and things that are not OK to talk about.
That was one of those things that was not OK to talk about."
It's
actually hard to find someone at Google who was bothered by the fact that there
once was a romantic relationship between Mayer and Page.
Perhaps
this is because both of them have so publicly moved on.
Mayer
and her husband, Zachary Bogue
In 2007, Page married a Stanford graduate student named Lucy
Southworth. The ceremony was on Richard Branson's private island.
That
same year, a Google colleague emailed Mayer to say: "I'm bringing a boy I
think you'd be interested in. Be cool." The "boy" was Zachary
Bogue. Tall and dark-haired, Bogue looks like he could be the star of "The
Bachelor." He had played football at Harvard, and was now a banker in San
Francisco. In 2009, Mayer and Bogue married. Vogue covered the ceremony. Of
their married life, he says: "We continue to do work in the evening.
There's never a distinct line between work and home. Marissa's work is such a
natural extension of her. It's not something she needs to shed at the end of
the day."
It's
possible that Mayer's romantic history with Page stalled her career at Google.
But that's not a widely held belief among Mayer's former colleagues.
A more
common explanation was that she may not have had the right kind of ambition to
go much further.
There's
a philosophy that corporations exist to benefit three constituencies:
shareholders, employees, and customers. At Google, there are two kinds of
customers: the users of Google's services and the advertisers who pay Google to
be seen by users.
Mayer
spent all her years at Google worried about just half of one of those
constituencies: users.
To be
fair, that was her job.
From
Google's earliest days, Mayer had always been tasked with making products that
users love. And she pursued this task with a single-minded passion, sleeping
four hours a night, working 100-hour weeks, grinding through back-to-back
meetings without breaks.
But Mayer
may have been a bit too single-minded in this pursuit — at least for the sake
of her future at Google.
Compared
to some Google executives who joined the company around the same time as Mayer,
Mayer showed much less interest in learning about the business side of the
company.
One
former Google executive who worked in ad sales says, "I did not work with
her, and that's telling."
This
executive says that even before Mayer joined Google's Operating Committee, she
had an open invitation to join its meetings — out of respect for her importance
to the company and in an effort to develop her career. But while Mayer would
always show up for meetings about Google's products, "she would never show
up for a business review."
Doug
Edwards, Xooglers
Susan
Wojcicki and Salar Kamangar during Google's early years
By contrast, two of Mayer's peers — Susan Wojcicki and Jeff
Huber — "would make the time and be there because they were interested in
expanding their horizons."
By
2010, when Mayer's Google career started stalling, Wojcicki and Huber were
getting promotions. Both would end up reporting directly to Larry Page. Huber
would become Mayer's boss. Today, Wojcicki is considered one of the two or
three most powerful executives at Google.
Mayer
missed several of these types of opportunities. In the months before he became
CEO again, Larry Page would hold two-hour, post-Operating Committee meetings on
Mondays that were more focused on long-term strategy.
One
executive who was flattered to be invited says, "I was pretty interested
in understanding the connection between Chrome and Android."
But
Mayer would hardly ever show, "either because she was traveling or who
knows."
Several
of the regular attendees at those meetings ended up with positions reporting
directly to Page.
One of
them was Sundar Pichai, now leading development of both Google's Chrome and
Android products. Pichai's ascent had to be bittersweet to Mayer. He used to
work for her, and she had promoted him. Now he was passing her by.
Matt
Rosoff
Sundar
Pichai
But a former colleague says Pichai was a perfect contrast to
Mayer when it came to being involved with Google as a whole.
"Sundar
would do anything to help the company. He was internally working
cross-functionally to get results. If someone was offline and didn't get the
strategy he'd sit down with them one-on-one. He really put work into it.
Marissa didn't do that at all."
One of
Mayer's former colleagues says she skipped all those meetings because, when it
came to the business side of Google, Mayer was always "less
interested."
"She
has a disposition toward the consumer side, and users."
This
trait undoubtedly shaped Mayer's career at Google, and it would be very
important later at Yahoo.
But
more than her lack of interest in the business side of Google, and certainly
more than her history with Page, there was one overriding reason for Marissa
Mayer's sudden decline in power.
Her
great strength, her teacherly I-know-best leadership style had finally begun to
grate on people at Google. Worse, it had begun to slow the company down.
Eventually,
a group of Google engineers decided to try and do something about it.
John
Battelle, who has put on several large tech conferences in the Bay Area, many
of them featuring Marissa Mayer as a speaker, says of her: "I've never had
a conversation with her when she wasn't completely certain she was right."
This
pedantic style works when you are the traffic cop in a room full of designers
and product managers, but it alienated some of Mayer's colleagues over the
years.
Mayer
and and Salar Kamangar clashed often.
One peer it irked in particular was Salar Kamangar. Now the CEO
of Google-owned YouTube, Kamangar joined Google as its ninth employee. He drafted
its original business plan, and handled financing and legal early on. Younger
than Mayer, he rose along with her at Google, though not as conspicuously.
Mayer
and Kamangar clashed often.
The
specific habit of Mayer's that drove Kamangar nuts was her ability to speak
incredibly fast, not allowing him to re-enter the debate.
"In
an academic situation, that's okay because the best ideas rise and you have
discussion," says one Googler, familiar with Kamangar's complaints about
Mayer. "But in a place where there are personal feelings involved, if you
can't win the debate regardless of how hard you try, because she will out-talk
you, that's a challenging situation."
The
rivalry between Mayer and Kamangar was so intense that when Kamangar was made a
vice president before her, she threatened to quit the company. She got her
promotion months later.
Another
Mayer habit that annoyed colleagues was one she picked up straight from
academia.
For
many years at Google, Mayer insisted that if her colleagues wanted to speak
with her, they had to do so during her "office hours." Mayer would
post a spreadsheet online, and ask that anyone who wanted to speak with her
sign up for a five-minute window.
When
Mayer's "office hours" rolled around in the afternoon, a line would start
to form outside of her office and spill over into the nearby couches.
"Office
hours" are socially acceptable in an academic environment because the
power dynamic is clear. The students are subordinate to the professor, usually
their elder and mentor.
But
Mayer's office hours were not just for her subordinates, but also her peers.
So
there, amid the associate product managers waiting to visit with Mayer to
discuss their latest assignment or a class trip to Zurich, sat Google vice
presidents — people who had been at the company as long as Mayer, and in some
cases held jobs as important as hers.
What
made the "office hours" even more obnoxious for some Google engineers
and product managers was that all consumer-facing product launches or updates
required Mayer's sign-off.
"Her
weakness was an unwillingness to delegate," says Craig Silverstein, the
Google engineer who hired Mayer years ago. "She doesn't need any sleep.
When you have four or five more hours in the day than most people do, you don't
learn to delegate because you don't need to."
The
team who grew most frustrated with Mayer over the "office hours" and,
more generally, the need for her to sign off on product changes, were the
engineers in charge of Google search.
One
story is that Amit Singhal told Larry Page that Mayer had to go.
Several of Mayer's former Google colleagues confirm that among
the most put off was Amit Singhal.
While Mayer
was in charge of the way Google Search looked, Singhal, was one of the
engineers in charge of creating the algorithms that actually power the search
engine. After he re-wrote Larry Page and Sergey Brin's original code in 2001,
he was named a "Google Fellow." He's a big deal inside the company.
One of
Mayer's former Google colleagues says that it was actually Singhal and three
other search engineers who finally went to Larry Page and asked that Mayer be
removed from the top of Google's search organization.
"These
four guys, they were constantly being hampered. They'd say: 'We want to roll
out this ranking change.' Marissa's like, 'until I review it, you can't launch
it.' They're like: 'But it's been three weeks.'"
Finally,
says this source, Singhal and the other engineers went to Larry Page and said,
"Take your pick. Her, or us."
In this
person's telling, Page made his choice and that's why Mayer was moved out of
search. She had become a bottleneck.
Other
people say Page removed Mayer from her perch atop search after lots of input
from lots of people.
Says
one Googler: "What Larry saw as he became CEO was that Marissa has a tough
user-interface that causes problems with other stakeholders."
Another
Googler familiar with those discussions says: "Everyone agreed that
something needed to change."
This
Googler wonders if Mayer was unfairly punished in 2010 and 2011.
"Sometimes
she got into trouble because she's ambitious and a woman and that's tough in a
man's world. People take potshots at her because she was very young and
successful. I also think she's young and learning and you sometimes don't get
things right."
Another
reason for Mayer's career stall in 2011 was that Google, as a company, had
grown up.
By
2010, Google had 24,000 employees. It wasn't going to be the kind of place
where, just because an executive had been there a long time and knew the
co-founders personally, she was going to be able to get whatever she wanted.
"You
couldn't run the company like that anymore," says one person who lived
through the transition.
"As
you grow you have to hire people who have done this stuff before, and having
people who haven't lord over them doesn't work."
So, by
early 2011, Marissa Mayer's progress at Google had stalled. But another,
greater opportunity was about to come her way.
Illustration
by Mike Nudelman
On the
afternoon of Monday, July 16, 2012, Yahoo chief revenue officer Michael Barrett
stood at a gate in New York's JFK airport, waiting to board a plane to London.
AdMeld
Michael
Barrett had only joined Yahoo weeks before Mayer.
Suddenly, his phone rang. It was a reporter. She said, "Oh
my God. You have a new boss. What do you think?"
The
reporter told Barrett the news: Yahoo had a new CEO. It was Marissa Mayer from
Google.
Barrett
was shocked.
Barrett
himself had only joined Yahoo from Google less than a month before.
Barrett's
job at Google had been a good one. He'd only left because Yahoo chairman Fred
Amoroso had told him that interim CEO Ross Levinsohn was going to get the
full-time job.
As Barrett
got back off the plane, he thought: What
the hell happened?
- - -
The
story of how Marissa Mayer came to Yahoo begins in the summer of 2011.
That's
when Dan Loeb, the manager of a hedge fund called Third Point, decided he could
make a lot of money investing in Yahoo if he could force a few people to quit
its board and install a CEO of his choosing.
There
were two simple reasons Loeb believed Yahoo was a worthwhile investment,
despite a decade of mismanagement. The first was that 700 million or so people
still went to Yahoo.com every month, even though the company hadn't come up
with a cool new product in years.
The
second was that Yahoo had made a brilliant investment in two Asian Internet
companies, Alibaba and Yahoo! Japan, and Loeb did not believe this investment
was being taken advantage of by management.
So Loeb
took a 5 percent stake in Yahoo and began a letter-writing,
shareholder-activist campaign to unseat its CEO and several of its board
members. In his letters, Loeb accurately pointed out that Yahoo had been
mismanaged for a decade, and that it was largely the board's fault. In
December, Yahoo's board hoped to appease Loeb by hiring PayPal president Scott
Thompson to be Yahoo's new CEO.
Loeb
was not appeased. Publicly, he began lobbying Thompson to install new board
members. Privately, Loeb asked a consultant he'd hired, former MTV president
Michael Wolf, to begin looking for someone who could replace Thompson.
David
Needleman
Dan
Loeb asked Michael Wolf to find a CEO for Yahoo.
With this mission in mind, Loeb and Wolf flew to San Francisco
for a series of meetings in January 2012.
One
morning during their trip, Loeb and Wolf drove south to meet with venture
capitalist Marc Andreessen for breakfast at his house. Famous for cofounding
Netscape, the original Web browser company, Andreessen had gone on to found two
other billion-dollar companies and a successful venture capital firm. By the
winter of 2012, Andreessen had become Silicon Valley's go-to wise man.
Loeb
and Wolf asked Andreessen if he'd join their slate for Yahoo's board. He
refused to participate in a deal perceived to be hostile to Yahoo's founders
and current management, but said he was happy to talk about Yahoo strategy.
The New
Yorkers asked him: Whom should Yahoo hire: a media person or a product person?
By a
"media person," they meant an executive who could run Yahoo almost
like a television network or magazine publisher, but on the Internet. This
person's specialties would be the ability to identify great content, close
deals with the people who create it and those who could distribute it, and the
skill set to sell ads against it. CBS chief executive Les Moonves and former
News Corp chief operating officer Peter Chernin are this kind of executive. So
was Michael Eisner when he spent 20 years transforming Disney from a sleepy
studio into a corporate giant.
By a
"product person," Loeb and Wolf meant someone who could get teams of
engineers and designers to build software tools that consumers find useful,
addictive, or fun. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg is this kind of executive. So
was Apple co-founder, Steve Jobs.
Almost
since its beginning, Yahoo had struggled with its identity.
Should
it act like a "media" company — one that tries to attract consumers
by producing and buying content and distributing it through Yahoo.com? Or
should Yahoo act like a "products" company — where Internet software
tools like search, Webmail, stock charts, and photo storage attract users?
AP
Marc
Andreessen
Andreessen said: If you get the chance to run Yahoo, the only
way you'll be able to save it is if you hire someone who can make great Yahoo
products.
Andreessen
talked about the difference between technology companies and "normal"
companies. He said the output of normal companies is their product: cars,
shoes, life insurance. In his view, the output of technologies companies is
innovation. Whatever they are selling today, they will be selling something
different in five years. If they stop innovating, they die.
Andreessen
said the person at the top of Yahoo needs to know how to pioneer and produce a
steady stream of innovative products if the company was going to survive in a
competition with large companies like Google, Facebook, and Apple or even some
of the Valley's many startups.
The
message stuck.
In May
2012, Loeb finally figured out a way to get Scott Thompson out of the CEO job.
Loeb
learned that Thompson had graduated from Stonehill College in 1979 with a
bachelor's degree in accounting — not a "bachelor's degree in accounting
and computer science" as Yahoo claimed on its website, and more
importantly, in an SEC filing from April.
On May
3, Loeb drafted a letter containing this information, and sent it to the Yahoo
board and the SEC, which would publish it for the public. On May 13, Thompson
resigned, citing health issues.
Scott
Thompson resigned from Yahoo after Dan Loeb revealed his bio was false.
The Yahoo board, which had hired Thompson without the help of an
outside executive search firm, also capitulated. In a legal settlement, it gave
Loeb much of what he'd been asking for since the summer before.
Five
directors resigned immediately. Loeb and Wolf gained board seats, and more
importantly, the chairmanship of two important committees. Loeb would chair the
board's transaction committee, which meant he would have sign-off power on any
sale of Yahoo's valuable Asian assets. Wolf would lead the executive search
committee, which had the immediate task of finding Yahoo's next CEO.
Wolf
had someone in mind — just the kind of "products" CEO Andreessen had
recommended. He hired executive recruiter Jim Citrin of Spencer Stuart, and
gave him a description of the Yahoo CEO job.
The
document Wolf gave Citrin said Yahoo needed to hire someone who can
"modernize" Yahoo's "user experiences" on mobile devices by
building a culture that attracts the best "content, developer, product
innovation, advertising, marketing and managerial talent." The document
said the board sought someone who could "reestablish Yahoo!'s credibility
and reputation in the tech-innovator community" and build partnerships
with companies such as "Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, and Amazon."
At
Citrin's first meeting with the board the week of May 21, 2012, he told the
directors there were only a few people in the industry who could do the job
described in Wolf's document. Citrin said those people were at companies like
Amazon, Apple, and Google. He said that it was going to be very difficult for
Yahoo to hire any of them.
The
board came up with a list of candidates for Citrin to approach.
Though
he was a "media," not a "products" executive, the top
prospect for most of the directors was Ross Levinsohn, who became interim Yahoo
CEO when Thompson stepped down.
Levinsohn,
who worked in Yahoo's Santa Monica office, is the kind of executive who looks
like he belongs in the CEO's office of a West Coast entertainment company.
He'll point at the camera when he's having his picture taken. He's got a wide
smile. His hair is combed back. He wears suits. He looks good in the fleece
zip-up sweater vests they give out at Allen & Co's Sun Valley conference
for media moguls.
Levinsohn
joined Yahoo in October 2010 as an executive vice president in charge of the
"Americas" region. Levinsohn had impressed shareholders with his
performance at Yahoo's annual shareholder meeting in 2011, when he presented a
vision for Yahoo as "the world's premier digital media company." For
a moment, he'd ended the confusion about what kind of company Yahoo was — a
"product" company or a "media" company. To many directors,
it seemed like Levinsohn understood the value of Yahoo's audience, and had a
plan to tap it.
AP
Apple's
Eddy Cue was a candidate for the Yahoo CEO job.
Among the other names were Nikesh Arora, the chief business
officer at Google; Eddy Cue, Apple's senior vice president of Internet Software
and Services; and Jason Kilar, then the CEO of Web TV site Hulu.
The
board also asked Citrin to approach Google's Marissa Mayer.
Citrin
cautioned that Mayer appeared to be a lifer at Google and was unlikely to be
interested in the job.
Many of
the directors wondered whether Mayer was actually capable of leading a large
public corporation. They asked question like: Had she ever managed a balance
sheet? Hadn't she been demoted only a year before?
Citrin
said he'd call Mayer anyway.
- - -
In the middle of June 2012, Marissa Mayer sat on a plane,
thinking and preparing. That Monday, she'd gotten a call from Jim Citrin of
executive search firm Spencer Stuart. He'd been retained by Yahoo, and he had
Yahoo director Michael Wolf with him.
Would
she like to speak to Wolf? She would.
Now
Mayer was flying to New York to have dinner at Wolf's Manhattan apartment with
Wolf, Citrin, and three other Yahoo directors: David Kenny, John Hayes, and
Thomas McInerney.
After
13 years at Google, she was surprised to find herself actually, finally, truly
considering leaving.
The
past two years at Google — since she was, according to the rest of the world
"demoted" — had been quieter than the first 11, but in many ways more
challenging and exciting.
In
local and geo, she'd taken over a much more massive operation than the one
she'd been running at Google.
Whenever
people asked her about the "demotion," as Wolf and the other
directors might over dinner, Mayer always pointed out how she had gone from
managing 250 product managers in search to supervising a much larger, more
diverse group of managers — 1,100 people managing engineering, design,
marketing, and sales. Mayer would tell people that she was supervising some
6,000 contractors.
She'd
figured out that by the fraction of the company, the geo and local piece that
she was running was something like 20-25 percent of the company's overall
headcount.
The
business challenges she'd dealt with in those years had been as diverse as the
types of people she managed.
In
September 2011, she went and bought Zagat for $125 million. It was not the kind
of deal someone who had been "demoted" could do. It was Google's
tenth-largest acquisition ever. More than that, the integration of Zagat into
Google search signaled a major change in Google's philosophy.
Previously,
the company had steadfastly refused to own or produce content that would show
up in its search engine. It would just index what was already out there being
created by the rest of the world.
But
after Mayer joined geo in 2010, she found that the "rest of the
world" wasn't as good at gathering geographic data and putting it on the
Web as it was creating websites for Google to index. So she decided it was time
for Google to start owning data. Her boss, Jeff Huber, and Larry Page had
backed her on the deal and the philosophical change, and now Google had lots of
content for location-based searches — a popular kind of search to do on mobile,
which was quickly becoming the future of the Internet.
Even as
Mayer was on the plane, she was playing a crucial part in helping Google fend
off one of its toughest competitors in mobile: Apple. Months before, she'd
noticed that Apple had started buying companies in the mapping space. Then
executive recruiters sent by Apple had started reaching out to her people.
Obviously,
they were up to something big. Mayer didn't know — Apple would never announce
it until it was done — but she figured it planned to remove Google Maps from
the iPhone and replace it with its own Apple Maps. She'd already countered
Apple's offers by giving her people what they really wanted. Sometimes it was
raises. Sometimes it was independence. Sometimes it was new titles. Sometimes
it was actually more work, more responsibility. She knew what her people
wanted. None of her reports ended up quitting to join Apple. Now, Mayer had her
team working on a new Google Maps app for iPhone. She was confident it was
going to beat anything Apple's people could come up with.
Mayer
knew that her job switch in 2010 looked like a demotion to some people outside
the company — especially people in the media. But as she flew to New York that
day in June 2012, Marissa Mayer knew that she'd spent the previous two years
learning a lot from a bigger job than she'd ever had before.
And now
she knew that she was ready for an even bigger one.
On the
evening of June 24, Mayer arrived at Wolf's modern, Fifth Avenue apartment. An
informal dinner was served.
Mayer
read for the part of Yahoo CEO.
Throughout
the conversation, Mayer touted a surprisingly thought-out plan for overhauling
Yahoo's culture, executive suite, and product line-up.
After
Mayer left, one of the board directors said to Citrin: "That's the next
CEO of Yahoo." The committee agreed that Wolf would stay in touch with
her.
One of
the directors noticed something funny, but decided to keep it to himself. Wolf
had served a very expensive bottle of wine, and Mayer hadn't had a sip.
Probably she was just nervous.
Wolf wants to hire Mayer,
but everyone else?
After
that dinner, Wolf, the chair of Yahoo's search committee, had decided that
Marissa Mayer should be the next CEO of Yahoo.
With
her experience running cornerstone Google products like Search, Google Maps,
and Gmail, she was exactly the kind of innovative, products-oriented CEO that
Silicon Valley wise man Marc Andreessen had told him to hire back in January.
But
Wolf, and his pro-Mayer allies on the board, had a problem.
By
mid-June, other Yahoo directors had already all but decided that interim CEO
Ross Levinsohn should get the full-time job.
Ross
Levinsohn and Katie Couric
When Thompson resigned in the middle of May, and Levinsohn was
named interim CEO, new chairman Fred Amoroso pulled Levinsohn aside and told
him to run Yahoo like he was going to be the full-time CEO. After that
conversation, Levinsohn sent a memo to all of Yahoo's employees. He wrote,
"I'm fired up and I hope you are too. I believe in the power of what we're
doing. We have an incredibly talented team, unparalleled strengths in key areas
and most importantly, I see the purple pride building everywhere. Let's move
forward quickly with conviction and confidence."
Levinsohn
ran with the opportunity, and by the end of June — really, just a few weeks —
he'd accomplished a lot. He'd signed a deal with Facebook over patents. He was
able to quickly recruit impressive executives into Yahoo, including Google
advertising executive Michael Barrett. Levinsohn and his top dealmaker, Jim
Heckman, were also able to nail down several content partnerships in just a few
weeks, including one with on-demand music service Spotify. Levinsohn and
Heckman were also busy working on much larger deals with Microsoft, Google, and
a fast-growing ad tech company based in New York called AppNexus.
As
Levinsohn worked hard to earn the full-time job, Yahoo directors began to come
under pressure from the rest of the industry to hand him the job. Levinsohn's
allies across the media, advertising, and entertainment industries wrote Yahoo
directors letters recommending him.
LinkedIn
CEO Jeff Weiner and cofounder Reid Hoffman lobbied for Ross Levinsohn.
At The Wall Street Journal's D: All Things Digital conference,
LinkedIn CEO Jeff Weiner and Linkedin co-founder and venture capitalist Reid
Hoffman enthusiastically endorsed Levinsohn, and said Yahoo would finally be in
good hands if it put him in charge.
After
several weeks went by without Yahoo naming a full-time replacement for
Thompson, even Marc Andreessen wrote a note to Loeb suggesting that Yahoo
should just put Levinsohn in the job permanently and commit to a media
strategy, since it seemed unlikely they could get a top-end product CEO, and
continued delays would permanently damage the company.
Meanwhile,
All Things D reporter Kara Swisher — who had, over the years, covered Yahoo
closer than anyone thanks to board-level sources — seemed to be actively
pushing for Yahoo to hire Levinsohn. She said the only reason the board hadn't
hired him yet was that it was looking for a "unicorn CEO — one who
actually does not exist but who sounds just dreamy."
By the
beginning of July, several board members were almost completely sold. They
wanted Levinsohn to keep the job.
The top secret interviews
The
Four Seasons in Palo Alto
On the morning of Wednesday, July 11, 2012, a small bus pulled
in front of the Four Seasons Hotel in East Palo Alto, California; a squat
all-glass building in the middle of a parking lot next to a highway. As the bus
idled, about a dozen middle-aged executives quietly boarded.
These
executives were the Yahoo board of directors, and as they boarded that bus,
they had no idea where they were going. Their destination was a secret because
these people — people who would soon have to come together and decide the fate
of Yahoo — did not trust each other.
That
day, the board was going to interview, for the last time, four finalist
candidates for the Yahoo CEO job.
The
search committee had decided that if the entire board knew where the final
interviews were taking place, one of the directors would inevitably leak the
location to All Things D reporter Kara Swisher. For years, the
aviators-wearing, tough-talking Swisher had been reporting Yahoo layoffs,
firings, hirings, and acquisitions before they actually happened. The new
directors assumed she had a source, or sources, on the old board, and they were
determined not to provide her new ones.
Six
days before, Swisher had reported, accurately, that the board was considering
Hulu CEO Jason Kilar for the job. The report had made things awkward for Kilar
with Hulu's corporate parents, Disney and News Corporation, and he'd pulled
himself out of the running — taking a good option away from the board. Some
members of the board felt Swisher had meant to nuke Kilar in order to help
Levinsohn get the job.
David
Kenny was particularly insistent on secrecy. The fall prior, before Scott
Thompson was hired, Kenny had interviewed for the CEO job at Yahoo. Word of his
meetings in Sunnyvale had gotten out, and Kenny had to resign from Akamai,
where he was president. Kenny recovered nicely — he'd become the CEO of The
Weather Channel — but he didn't want the same thing happening to any of the
executives interviewing that day.
The
directors rode in the bus for exactly five miles — south on University, south
on 101, off the highway at Oregon Expressway, and continuing onto Page Mill
road.
Google
Street View
This is
the secret location of the Yahoo CEO interviews
After 10 to 15 minutes, the the bus pulled into an office park,
and everyone got out.
They'd
arrived at the offices of Third Point's law firm, Gibson Dunn. The location was
ostensibly picked by headhunter Jim Citrin, who'd also arranged the buses. But
some of the directors took it as a signal from the Third Point board members
about whose show this really was.
Citrin
had also arranged for a car to pick up Levinsohn. He had no idea where he was
going, either. He also didn't know who the other finalists were.
Levinsohn
went first. He presented his plan, which the board was familiar with by then.
He wanted to get Yahoo out of the "platform" business, where it was
competing with Google, Microsoft, and Facebook — and move it into the content
business. Levinsohn knew some of the directors were worried that he'd ignore
Yahoo's engineers and product development people, so he talked about how he'd
been spending a lot of time with product boss Shashi Seth and his team.
The
interview felt strange to Levinsohn. He'd been talking to Loeb a handful of
times, every day. He said, "You guys know where I'm at. You know what I'm
doing."
After,
Jim Citrin told Levinsohn he'd done well. Levinsohn was told that if the board
decided to go in the "media" direction, the job was his.
Levinsohn
left.
After
enough time had passed to ensure that they wouldn't spot each other, Mayer
arrived by limo.
Anyone
remotely familiar with her childhood, studies, and career could have predicted
what happened next.
Mayer
walked into that room at Gibson Dunn and blew them away.
She
described her long familiarity with Yahoo and its products. She described how
Yahoo products would evolve over time under her watch. Her presentation
included an extraordinary amount of detail on Yahoo's search business, audience
analytics, and data. She talked about fixing Yahoo's culture with more
transparency, perks, and accountability. She named her perceived weaknesses,
and explained how she planned to address them — including by hiring people who
had the skills she didn't have.
When
Mayer was done, Jim Citrin told her he'd call her with the board's decision by
8 p.m.
She
left. The board still had a tough final decision to make.
A
number of the Yahoo directors still opposed hiring Mayer. They argued that she
didn't have enough corporate experience. Some of the directors favored
Levinsohn because they felt that the Third Point directors were just trying to
install someone they could control. They had not overlooked that the
"secret" location of the final interviews had been the offices of
Third Point's lawyers.
Brad
Smith worried Mayer didn't have enough corporate experience.
The directors who opposed Mayer — most vocally Amoroso, but also
Brad Smith and David Kenny — argued that Levinsohn, with his "media"
strategy, had a better plan for Yahoo than Mayer and her "products"
strategy.
They
argued that Mayer may present a greater upside — she was more likely to come up
with the next Facebook or Google Maps or Twitter — but that Levinsohn was the
safer bet, a more guaranteed return.
Loeb,
who had fought a bloody fight to get onto the board, and whose vote undoubtedly
mattered the most, didn't mind that Mayer was a high-risk, high-reward play. In
his view, the sale of Yahoo's Asian assets and the returning of those proceeds
through share buybacks or dividends would provide enough of a "floor"
in Yahoo's value that it was worth betting on the greater upside Mayer brought
to the table.
The 8
p.m. deadline came and went. Mayer, at a dinner party on the other side of
town, tried to stop checking her phone.
At 9:45
p.m., the board still hadn't called her. She signaled to her husband, Zachary
Bogue, that she wanted to leave the party.
Wolf
lobbied his fellow directors in favor of Mayer to the point of annoyance.
Finally,
the pro-Mayer directors proposed a solution. What if they made Mayer the CEO
and offered Levinsohn a huge amount of money to stay on as her COO? That way
she'd be able to pursue her "products" strategy, and he could keep
running the sales force and making deals with major media companies.
An
informal vote was cast. The pro-Mayer directors were in the majority, with
Amoroso and others voting against.
It was
over. A formal vote was cast.
This
time the board unanimously voted to name Marissa Mayer the new CEO of Yahoo.
Meanwhile,
Mayer and Bogue had decided to stay at their dinner party, but it was finally
time to go. As they began to say their goodbyes, Mayer's phone finally rang. It
was Jim Citrin. She let it go to voicemail.
Spencer
Stuart
Jim
Citrin called Marissa Mayer to offer her the job.
Citrin told her: "Marissa ... you
should be smiling. We're smiling. Call me ASAP."
When
the board reached Mayer to offer her the job, she did not accept it right away.
First she had some news to share.
She was
five months pregnant. That's why she hadn't touched her wine at Michael Wolf's
apartment the month before.
The
offer stood. After three days of negotiation with Wolf, she accepted.
The
morning after Mayer got the voicemail from Citrin, Levinsohn was unaware that
his fate had already been sealed. Once again he presented his plan for Yahoo to
the board — this time with his executive team there to fill in the details.
He'd
woken up that morning still feeling confident that he was going to get the job.
But this was the meeting where, midway through, Loeb left to go to the bathroom
and Wolf stood with Wilson to loudly question the deals Heckman had been
negotiating with Google, Microsoft, and others.
Levinsohn
went into the weekend at Allen & Co.'s mogul conference at Sun Valley sure
he'd lost the job, but unsure to whom. By Sunday, Ross Levinsohn had found out
that the board had also interviewed Marissa Mayer. When he heard her name, he
knew it was over.
On
Monday, Levinsohn went to work. Yahoo had to report its second quarter earnings
that week, and he worked with CFO Tim Morse's team to prepare some remarks for
the company's conference call with analysts. Levinsohn kept telling the team,
"don't write this for me, write it for a CEO. It should be generic."
When
that was done, Levinsohn went back to his office to wait for the news. He'd
wanted this job. He'd fought for it. He'd done well.
Fred
Amoroso broke the bad news to Levinsohn.
Finally, Fred Amoroso walked into Levinsohn's office and
delivered the blow.
Back in
New York and barely off a British Airways plane now heading for London, Michael
Barrett joined a conference call with other top Yahoo executives.
Amoroso
explained the news.
He
said, "We love Ross. We thank Ross. We want him to stay. We weren't
looking for someone like Marissa, but when she showed up, boy were we
impressed."
"Although
it was a hard decision, and we think Ross is doing a great job, she brings a
different level of perspective and talent to the organization we couldn't pass
up."
Illustration
by Mike Nudelman
On
Tuesday, July 17, 2012, David Filo stood waiting at the entrance of Yahoo's
headquarters in Sunnyvale, Calif. He was very excited.
Filo is
a quiet, unassuming engineer for Yahoo. He works in a cubicle. He also happens
to be a co-founder of the company.
Yahoo
CEO Marissa Mayer and co-founder David Filo.
In
2012, Filo still owned 6 percent of Yahoo. He was its largest individual
shareholder. According to Forbes, there were only 959 people on the planet with
more money than him.
And
yet, the reason Filo was waiting near the entrance of Yahoo was so that when
Marissa Mayer arrived, he would be able to unfurl a long purple carpet before
her feet.
Yahoo's
hero was coming. But huge challenges faced her.
Yahoo's
websites were getting fewer and fewer visitors every year. Meanwhile, Yahoo's
mobile apps were being largely ignored.
For
years, Yahoo's most talented executives and engineers had been quitting the
company to join faster-moving rivals like Facebook and Google. Those who stayed
at Yahoo tended to show up late and leave early, or log-in from home. Mayer had
to fix Yahoo's culture.
Mayer
also walked into the office that day seven months pregnant. Her new colleagues
looked to see if she was showing. They wondered how in the world she would
manage a baby and the huge job ahead of her.
The
excitement was everywhere in the building. One enthusiastic Yahoo employee had
made a poster with Mayer's face on it in the style of Shepard Fairey's 2008
campaign poster for Barack Obama. Across the lower third, the poster has one
word in all-caps: "HOPE."
When
she finally arrived, Mayer's first job was to meet the one group of Yahoo
employees who were not as excited by her arrival — Yahoo's senior executives,
several of whom had risen to their jobs thanks to Ross Levinsohn.
Levinsohn,
despite personal pleas from Amoroso and whispers of a generous compensation
package, was not staying as Mayer's chief operating officer. Since he took the
interim job in May, he'd warned the board that if he didn't get the permanent
gig, he was going to try to become a CEO somewhere else.
If
Levinsohn ever had any notion of reconsidering, that was squashed by his first
scheduled meeting with Mayer.
After
he'd learned that she was getting the job, he'd flown back home to Los Angeles.
When Mayer said she wanted to meet, he agreed to fly back up to Sunnyvale. But
when he showed up at their appointed time, Mayer's assistant told Levinsohn she
was running late.
Levinsohn
said to the assistant, "My office is three doors down. I'll be in
there."
Suddenly
anxious, the assistant said: "You have to wait here."
She
wanted him to wait so that when Mayer was done with whatever she was doing, he
would be immediately available.
Levinsohn
said, "Not so much." He walked away.
Soon he
walked out of the building for good.
Levinsohn
decided that no good would come of him staying. He could see what would happen:
Yahoo would devolve into a place where there were his people and there were
Mayer's people. The whole "media" versus "products" battle
would rage on, and it would be an ugly fight.
And so,
feeling that the rug had just been ripped out from underneath them, Yahoo's
senior executives walked into Mayer's new office at Yahoo — the one Fred
Amoroso had been using days before.
Many of
these people were meeting Mayer for the first time, and they expected to sit
across from the woman they'd read about in so many fluffy profiles and had seen
on TV or on stage at conferences — someone who was charismatic and warm;
personal.
That
was not what they got.
One by one, they walked in and sat down at a table across from
Mayer. Then, she launched into questions. She asked: "Where did you get
your education?" "Where are you from?" "What do you do
here?" And so on.
As
Yahoo executives answered, Mayer took notes on their answers with pen on paper,
hardly looking up.
"It
kind of felt like you were summoned to the principal's office," says one
executive who went through one of these introductory meetings with Mayer.
"You
would have thought a fair portion of [that meeting] would have been about 'so
what are you going through? How are you feeling? Sorry about Ross. We love him.
We'd like to keep him. Realistically, he won't stay but that doesn't have any
impact on you.'
"There
wasn't any kind of commiseration or any kind of bear hug. There wasn't even a
question of 'Are you in or are you out?' It was: 'I assume you're in. Let me
know otherwise.'
"There
was no time for short conversation or human emotions. It was very boom, boom,
boom.
"Most
people walked away from that meeting saying, 'Holy shit.'"
One
Yahoo executive attended such an introductory meeting between his boss and
Mayer. His boss asked Mayer "Would you like to meet the people I
brought?"
Mayer
looked at them.
"No."
The
truth is, the person Yahoo's top executives sat across from in those first
meetings was not the Marissa Mayer they thought they knew from the media
coverage of her. It was the Marissa Mayer her Stanford classmate Josh Elman
remembers from late night study sessions.
Just as
during those all-nighters almost 20 years before, Mayer wasn't at Yahoo to
socialize. In one early meeting Mayer said that Yahoo was going to fail — shut
down — in the next few years if it did not get things going soon. She told a
top product executive that Yahoo lagged in innovation and talent, and that its
culture was broken.
She was
there to save the company, and that was going to take a lot of work. It was
past time to get started.
Some of
the executives Mayer met with had a hard time connecting with her. Just as some
of her Stanford study mates mistook her shyness for being "stuck up,"
some of her new Yahoo colleagues took her all-business attitude as being
"demeaning."
For the
people who were making Yahoo's products at the time, the meetings were even
more intense.
A
designer or a top product manager would sit down and Mayer would assault them
with a series of questions.
"How
was that researched?"
"What
was the research methodology?"
"How
did you back that up?"
One person
who went through a Mayer grilling says, "It was scary for a lot of people
because of its intensity."
Jim
Heckman's and Marissa Mayer's personalities clashed.
The most pivotal meeting Mayer had in her first few days at
Yahoo was with Levinsohn's dealmaker, Jim Heckman.
She had
to learn exactly what Heckman had been negotiating with Yahoo's competitors.
She had to decide whether or not to finalize these deals or to unwind them altogether.
More broadly, Mayer had to understand the direction Heckman and Levinsohn had
been taking Yahoo, and decide whether to keep it going that way or to slam on
the brakes.
It is
possible that, in the history of business, there has never been a meeting between
two people whose personalities, styles, and priorities clash more than Mayer's
and Heckman's.
Mayer
is passionate about the pixels in the picture. She's shy. She's careful. She's
bold, but not reckless. She's idealistic about people. She'll pay $60,000 to
meet a designer, but wear his dress modestly.
Jim
Heckman breaks glass. He's squinty-eyed and caffeinated. He makes deals. He
uses your first name. He quotes the comedian Tosh.0. He doesn't care about the
headcount; he cares about the bottom line. Once, at a Yahoo party held on a
yacht during the Cannes Lions Festival in France, Heckman brought a date who
decided to go topless. There was a lot of shouting on the yacht.
Heckman
met with Mayer during her first few days at Yahoo. Heckman laid out the plan he
and Levinsohn had been working on for the past year. If implemented it would
have completely changed the way Yahoo did business.
Yahoo
makes its money by selling advertising. Heckman and Levinsohn believed that
Yahoo had spent too much money and too much time trying to invent advertising
technology that would allow Yahoo to charge higher ad rates. He believed that
companies like Google, Microsoft, and AppNexus were far ahead of Yahoo in the
world of ad tech, and that Yahoo was better off partnering with one of those
companies and getting rid of the people it employed to work on ad tech.
Heckman
told Mayer he believed partner ad technology would immediately raise Yahoo's ad
rates.
Moreover,
with the money Yahoo would save by getting rid of the people it had working on
ad tech, it could go out and buy high quality video content from Hollywood
studios. He argued that advertisers would be willing to pay much higher ad
rates if Yahoo's content quality were higher. He said rates could go from under
$2 per 1,000 impressions to $20.
In
Heckman's vision, Yahoo.com was more like a cable TV provider with a large,
installed audience, than it was a maker of technology products.
Microsoft
Steve
Ballmer was ready to give MSN.com to Yahoo.
Heckman said he already had a deal negotiated with Google
executive Henrique De Castro to begin using Google's advertising technology
instead of Yahoo's.
Heckman
said the same theory could be applied to other second-, third-, or fourth-place
Yahoo businesses. He talked about how Boeing lets GE, Rolls-Royce, and
Pratt-Whitney make the actual engines for its airplanes.
He told
Mayer that he'd negotiated a deal with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer, wherein
Yahoo would turn over its entire search business — patents and all — in
exchange for Microsoft's large online media property, MSN.com, and long-term,
guaranteed cash payments.
Heckman
said his plan would allow Yahoo to run with just 4,000 full-time employees, far
fewer than the 15,000 full-timers and thousands more contractors Yahoo employed
then. He said Yahoo EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and
Amortization) would increase by 50 percent if Mayer closed his deals.
Mayer
heard him out, taking notes the whole time.
Within
24 hours, Mayer let Heckman know that she'd canceled all his deals and that his
services were no longer needed by Yahoo.
Heckman
flew to Ibiza, Spain for a 30-day vacation.
Mayer
began to hire her own people.
Ironically,
one of her biggest hires in her first few months at Yahoo was the Google
executive Jim Heckman had been negotiating with, Henrique De Castro.
Mayer
made De Castro Yahoo's COO, and agreed to pay him as much as $62 million over
four years, not counting annual stock grants.
This
hire came as a surprise to Michael Barrett, the Google executive Ross Levinsohn
had hired to run Yahoo ad sales. Though Barrett had been hired by Levinsohn, he
was trying to make a go of things at Mayer's Yahoo.
Barrett
had heard rumors that Mayer was going to hire someone to replace him, but when
he confronted her about them she said she wasn't going to hire anyone above
him, and certainly not Henrique De Castro. She even hinted that Barrett could
be Yahoo's chief operating officer.
But
then Barrett read a story on AllThingsD.com saying that De Castro had been
hired.
Hurt,
but politic, he called Mayer's office intending to congratulate her on the big
hire. He wanted to begin discussing his own exit, as well.
Barrett
got Mayer's assistant.
She
said, "Marissa is unavailable. I'm sure she'd love to hear from you. Could
I have her call you back?"
Barrett
said fine.
Mayer
called him back while he was out to dinner in San Francisco.
As he
picked up the phone, he expected her to begin the conversation with an apology
for blindsiding him.
But all
Mayer said was, "You called?"
Stunned
that Mayer would either pretend to not know why he called or actually didn't
know why, Barrett said, "Yeah, I just wanted to say congrats on Henrique.
He sounds like a really great hire."
Mayer
said, "I wasn't able to tell anyone I was hiring him. I don't think you
should feel bad."
"I
don't really feel bad at all," he said.
The two
never talked again, and Barrett left Yahoo with a severance package worth many
millions of dollars.
Add caption |
Henrique
De Castro's nickname is "the most interesting man in the world,"
after the Dos Equis spokesman.
De Castro has a distinct reputation among his former colleagues
on the advertising side of Google's business. All consider him sharp and
effective. But he speaks with a heavy accent, is considered deeply pompous, and
likes to speak in aphorisms. His nickname is "the most interesting man in
the world," after the Dos Equis spokesman.
Mayer's
next most important and controversial hire was a long-time private equity
investor named Jacqueline Reses.
Though
Reses had no experience in human resources, Mayer put her in charge of it at
Yahoo. Mayer hired Reses because Mayer's plan to improve the talent level at
Yahoo was to buy lots of failed startups for small amounts of money.
Mayer
believed that Reses would be expert at nailing down those kinds of
transactions. She has been. In Mayer's first year, Yahoo bought more than 20
startups.
Steven
Henry, Getty Images
Jackie
Reses is Mayer's executive bagman.
Reses, a "gruff" and "matter-of-fact,"
executive also served another purpose for Mayer: executioner. In December 2012,
she called up Michael Katz, a Yahoo executive based in New York, and asked him
out for a drink at a Mexican restaurant called Dos Caminos. It was a Sunday and
Katz was celebrating the second night of Hanukkah, but he figured Reses would
only ask him out at such an inconvenient time for something important. One
drink in, she fired him — just weeks before a multi-million-dollar bonus was
due. (He sued.)
Mayer
replaced Levinsohn's chief marketing officer, Mollie Spillman, in August —
while Spillman was on vacation. The new CMO was Kathy Savitt, a
"bubbly" and "charismatic" executive who'd founded a
startup in 2009 after running marketing for teen retail giant American Eagle
Outfitters.
After
completing the sale of some Alibaba stock back to Alibaba and netting Yahoo
almost $8 billion in cash, CFO Tim Morse left the company at the end of
September 2012. Mayer hired the plain-spoken Ken Goldman to replace him.
Mayer
kept some of Levinsohn's people in place during her first year. Media boss
Mickie Rosen would last until July 2013.
In the middle of all
this, a baby
On
Sept. 30, 2012 Mayer gave birth to a baby boy. For weeks, Mayer and Bogue
called their child only "BBBB" for "Big Baby Boy Bogue."
They would eventually name him Macallister.
Mayer's
pregnancy had been a fascination of the media, women around the world, and
plenty of her Yahoo coworkers. Everyone wondered how she would handle having a
newborn while trying to turn around a multi-billion-dollar public company.
Mayer
made the baby-raising part look easy.
She
took just a two-week maternity leave. Then, two months after giving birth,
Mayer told the audience at a conference on women in business: "The baby's
been way easier than everyone made it out to be."
What
Mayer didn't say was that, thanks to her incredible wealth and power at Yahoo,
she had a lot of help with Macallister. At home, she had a full-time staff. At
Yahoo, she knocked down a wall in her office and set up a nursery so that
Macallister — and his nanny — could come to the office with her every day.
The
comments upset a lot of women. Lisa Belkin of The Huffington Post wrote an open
letter to Mayer, in which she said, "Dear Marissa Mayer ... Putting 'baby'
and 'easy' in the same sentence turns you into one of those mothers we don't
like very much."
Many of
the same women would also take issue with Mayer in the spring of 2013, when she
banned employees from working from home. Working from home was a convenient way
for many of them to continue their careers after giving birth. Why was Mayer
taking such a stance against it?
Mayer
hadn't intended to make a statement. She'd only wanted more people in the
office at Yahoo. As for fighting for the working conditions of women, Mayer
says that she is not a "feminist." She says she is "blind to
gender."
Mayer goes missing
By the
middle of the fall of 2012, a camaraderie developed between all of Mayer's
direct reports, and enthusiasm in the Yahoo workforce was swelling.
This
was in part due to a series of cultural reforms Mayer brought to Yahoo almost
immediately upon her arrival.
REUTERS/Stephen
Lam
She wanted to recreate the high-energy, high-productivity
culture of Google's early days, when she had been happy working 100-hour weeks
as a programmer.
She
made the food free and started taking her own lunches in the employee
cafeteria. She took down cubicle walls. She joined in on email chains with
lower-level employees. She banned BlackBerrys and gave top-of-the-line company
smartphones to every employee. She created a forum where employees could
complain about issues and suggest solutions. Parking lots that had been empty
until 10 a.m. and again after 4 p.m. were suddenly full from 8 a.m. to 6:30
p.m.
On
Fridays, Mayer would host a weekly meeting she called "FYI." All
Yahoo employees were invited. She'd go over her plans for the company, that
week's "wins" for Yahoo, and answer questions from the crowd.
Mayer
dazzled. She was in her element. It was like she was back at Stanford, teaching
fellow undergraduates the material she'd just learned the year before.
"If
you go to the Friday meetings, it's like a Berkshire Hathaway annual
meeting," says one executive who attended them.
"We
would take the stage after she would open, so we were standing off the stage,
watching the audience. You should have sees the rapture in their eyes. They
were like smitten teenagers. It is unbelievable.
"She
is deified. The first 50 rows are packed with the engineering team and they're
cheering her on. There is no question that there's a palpable level of energy
and renewed enthusiasm and renewed pride."
Just a
few weeks in, Yahoo employee morale and productivity hit a high not seen in a
decade.
There
was only one serious complaint from Mayer's top executives: She never seemed to
be around when they needed her. What was she working on all the time?
Mayer
demanded all of her staff across the world join the call, so executives from
New York, where it was 6 p.m., and Europe, where it was as late as midnight
would dial-in too.
Inevitably,
Mayer herself would show up at least 45 minutes late. Some calls started so
late that Yahoo's executives in Europe didn't hang up till 3 a.m. their time.
One of
Mayer's former Google colleagues says the lateness habit is something Mayer
picked up during her 13 years at Google.
Lockerz
Even
executives hired by Mayer, like CMO Kathy Savitt, felt ignored by her early on.
"Eric,
Larry, and Sergey were always late and causing everybody in the organization to
be late. They would hold you over, and then you would be late. And then the
next meeting would start late and then run late. And then all of the staff in
that meeting would be late. It would just trickle down through the organization.
Is Marissa Mayer always late? Well, yeah. But it was endemic to the
organization."
Mayer's
lateness was a pain, sure. But by the early fall of 2012, Mayer's staff had
grown used to it. In fact, they were actually glad when she'd show up late to a
meeting, because that meant at least she hadn't blown it off entirely.
Mayer
had approximately 25 people reporting directly to her during her first year at
Yahoo. In theory, she was keeping up with each of them in a regularly scheduled
weekly meeting. In practice, she would go weeks without talking to people
because she was so busy.
For a
while, each of those 25 people thought that Mayer was just picking on them,
individually. The people who had been at Yahoo before Mayer joined assumed that
this meant she was going to fire them soon. The people Mayer had just hired
into the company, including Reses and Savitt, were even more puzzled. Why had
they been hired only to be ignored?
But
then, during one of those long waiting periods after 3 p.m. on a Monday, a
conversation unfurled that revealed all.
Making
small talk, one executive said to another: "Did she cancel one of your
one-on-ones again?"
A third
jumped in: "Oh my god, she does that to you too?"
It
turned out that everyone in the room and on the call had been canceled on by
Mayer, frequently.
"Everyone
assumed that they were the only one being canceled on. But then they realized
that they weren't," says one person who was in those meetings.
The
problem with Mayer canceling her scheduled meetings with everyone is that it
was otherwise impossible to see her.
"That
was your only point of contact with her. There wasn't a lot of serendipity of
bumping into her or having her pop her head into a meeting. Getting onto her
calendar was nothing short of impossible."
One
person who kept getting blown off by Mayer remembers thinking: "I may not
be you, but I'm running a huge part of your business. I've got thousands of
people reporting to me. The chance that I would miss a meeting with my directs
without an explanation is none.
"First
of all, I don't miss those meetings. Maybe it happens once in a year because of
something. But then I'm going to pick up the phone and I'm going to call them
and I'm going to apologize and I'm going to say I'm sorry, I'll make it up to
you, let's schedule some other time. I'm not going to make them wait for more
than five minutes because I know they have incredibly important things to do.
And they are human beings."
During
those staff meetings, Mayer made little time for certain topics early on — especially
those having to do with revenue, advertising technology, or distribution.
Mayer
would only entertain three deals per week, and it was quickly obvious the ones
she would always prefer to talk about: anything to do with product. If Reses
wanted to talk about an aqui-hire that would bring a talented product manager
into Yahoo, Mayer would prioritize the conversation. If there was talk of a
partnership with Apple on a new Weather app, that would definitely be
discussed.
There
was a reason for Mayer's lateness, for the skipped meetings, and for the
priority of product discussions during those meetings, though.
Prior
to joining Yahoo, Mayer had decided the company's many problems boiled down to
one: everything going out the front door from PR to marketing to products was
flawed. In her first months at the company, Mayer's plan was to immediately
stop that from happening ever again.
It
would take an incredible amount of time and effort. Picture a dam sprouting
leaks, and Mayer trying to plug them with all her fingers and toes.
"Who is this woman
and what is she actually saying?"
A week
after Mayer joined Yahoo, a Yahoo employee took a photo of one of the
purple-on-purple Marissa Mayer HOPE posters taped to the walls of Yahoo and
sent it to a Google employee named Hunter Walk.
Walk
tweeted it, and soon the poster was a news story.
One of
Mayer's former subordinates from Google, Katie Jacobs Stanton, by then a vice
president at Twitter, saw the tweet, and replied to Walk in her own public
tweet. She wrote: "I hope that went through UI review :)"
The
joke is a reference to the user-interface reviews that Mayer famously insisted
on conducting for every consumer-facing Web product Google launched from 2005
to 2010 before she was removed from the top of the search products
organization.
Stanton
was suggesting that the Mayer she knew, the one she once reported to, would
soon have strict control over all of Yahoo, and especially anything Yahoo made
for the public's consumption.
Stanton
was spot on.
Upon taking control of Yahoo, Mayer's first instinct was to
survey and quantify everything that Yahoo was doing that the public could see,
and then start controlling it.
This
applied to all areas of Yahoo, including public relations. Throughout the fall,
every week, all the Yahoo PR people had to complete a big spreadsheet with the
names of every reporter they wanted to talk to and what the business objective
was. This spreadsheet was then submitted to the head of Yahoo PR, Anne
Espiritu. Espiritu would then submit the form to Mayer. Mayer, in turn, would
approve or reject every call or email and then pass the form back down the
line.
If
Yahoo's public relations staff had any complaints about these tactics, they
could bring them to Espiritu during her weekly office hours.
No
group had a shorter leash than Yahoo's largest, most important team: the
hundreds of people in charge of creating, developing, designing, and updating
Yahoo products.
On
Tuesday, Dec. 11, 2012, Marissa Mayer wrote a blog post announcing a new
version of Yahoo Mail for the Web, Windows 8, the iPhone, and Android.
It was
a huge moment for the new Yahoo. No Yahoo product, perhaps other than the Yahoo
homepage, is as important to Yahoo as Yahoo Mail. It's the biggest reason any
of Yahoo's 700 million users ever bother to go to Yahoo.com in the first place.
And over the previous few years, it had slowly been losing users.
"Email
is the ultimate daily habit," Mayer says in the post. "It's often the
first thing we check in the morning and the last thing before going to
bed."
Three
months before those words hit the Web, Mayer and 30 designers, product
managers, and engineers sat around a huge table in one of Yahoo's large, traditional
conference rooms.
Mayer
was talking. Fast. As she spoke, two of the people seated near her typed away
like crazy, trying to take verbatim notes in Google Docs. They were struggling
to keep up.
This
group of people had been meeting three times a week for a month, and they'd
turned the conference room into a space that now looked more like a design
studio. Windows ran down one side of the room. On the other side, projectors
hung from the ceiling, rendering screens on the wall. Between the projections stood
20 or 30 huge pieces of foam core pinned up with a collection of ideas about
what a new Yahoo homepage and a new Yahoo email could look like.
For the
30 people sitting around the table, their first meetings with Mayer over the
past month had been terrifying.
For
years, Yahoo had been a place where the CEO was a distant figure who would meet
with various members of his or her executive leadership team to lay out broad
strategies for each function: design, technology, product, etc.
Mayer
skipped all that.
"She
was like 'yeah, yeah, yeah. We'll get to that. Let's first get some stuff out
the door that actually works,'" says a witness to those early days.
It was
a level of energized scrutiny none of them were used to.
Mayer
came at them with "a voracious flood of possibilities" about what the
new products could look like. Her ideas were both big and small — minute even.
Mayer displayed such a "profound capacity for detail," that the
leadership in the room finally set up the two transcribers so that later they
could "share and dissect" all of Mayer's ideas and decisions.
One of
them remembers thinking: "Who is this woman and what is she actually
saying?"
But
soon, as the weeks wore on, the 30 people in that room began to learn how to
respond to what Mayer was saying.
Some of
the people in the room were growing frustrated with the pace, but others began
contributing. Among those who contributed, Mayer learned who to trust. Those
trusted people began to grow in confidence and they started to contribute even
more.
Soon,
these once-terrifying meetings became friendly, fun. Jokes started to fly
around.
"It
warmed up," says someone who was in those meetings. "Once we learned
how to operate on that level of intensity with her, she softened and it became
more of an interaction."
"You'd
look at her and she's smiling!"
This
was Mayer in her ultimate element.
She was
pushing the pace as she had those late nights working on problems for
Philosophy 160A. She was teaching, as she had 3,000 Stanford undergraduates.
She was creating, as she had those pompom routines 25 years before. She was
using data to empathize with hundreds of millions of people all at once, as she
had learned to do at Google.
"I've
never seen anybody like [her]," says someone from those meetings. Mayer,
he says, was "somebody who could see a whole collection of possibilities
and could just talk about her experiences and principles."
"In
that way she would start to not only share how she was thinking, but also help
us learn a lens to look through to be able to connect where she was coming from
and what we were about."
Mayer's
intensity was contagious. By November, the Yahoo Mail team was working nights
and weekends, racing to finish by an insane early December deadline. This was a
credit to Mayer and the leader of the Mail team, Shashi Seth, a product leader
Mayer inherited.
Finally,
the Mail team finished their work at the end of November. They were proud of
their work, and they deserved to be. Never had Yahoo built and launched a
version of Mail so quickly. The last time Yahoo had done it, it took 18 months
to build the product and another six months to roll it out.
But
then Yahoo learned another lesson about what making products would be like with
Marissa Mayer as CEO.
One day
before the new Yahoo Mail was set to launch, Mayer called a meeting with CMO
Kathy Savitt, Shashi Seth, and the entire product and engineering leadership
team — about 10 people in total. They met in Phish Food, the conference room
where months before, Ross Levinsohn had pitched an alternate reality for Yahoo
to a board that wasn't really listening.
Everyone
settled in; Mayer dropped a bombshell. For months, it had been decided that the
new Yahoo Mail's colors would be blue and gray. The thought was that users were
going to be looking at Yahoo Mail on their phones all day long, and so it was
best to choose the most subtly contrasting colors possible.
Mayer
wanted to change the colors entirely — from blue and gray to purple and yellow.
Seth's
body language shifted immediately. He looked deflated. He was going to have to
tell his people the news.
Changing
the color of a product like Yahoo Mail sounds easy, but it's not. Mayer's
decision meant that some unlucky group of people were going to have to manually
go and change the color in literally thousands of places — all while working
under a deadline.
Seth's
team got the changes done, but there was fallout from Mayer's decision. The
lead Yahoo Mail designer quit and went to Google. The Yahoo Mail product
manager went to Disney. The lead engineer left and founded a startup. Seth
himself left Yahoo in January 2013, a month after Mail launched.
One
person, frustrated by the incident, says he'd hoped the Yahoo Mail launch would
make people "incredibly proud of what they've accomplished" and that
they would be inspired to "stick around for years to come."
"It
was the exact opposite," he says.
But
others have a different perspective.
Their
view is that Mayer refused to launch a product that she didn't think was
finished. A product's color may seem superficial, but Mayer is obsessed with
data that shows it is not. At Yahoo's scale, if you can change a color a little
bit and effect the performance by some factor of .01 percent, that translates
into millions of dollars.
In this
view, when Mayer forced already burnt-out people to work even harder at the
very last minute to make sure a product went out as good as it could be, she
set a marker for the new era of Yahoo.
"The
precedent made the next project easier to deal with," says one person who
helped launch Yahoo Mail. "We'd gotten comfortable with what Yahoo-ness
was about."
Mayer put Adam Cahan in charge of a new group called
"Mobile and Emerging Products."
Yahoo's mobile problem
When
Mayer came to Yahoo in 2012, Yahoo's mobile traffic was still tiny compared to
other big tech companies like Google and Facebook. Yahoo's mobile apps weren't
very popular either.
So when
Mayer joined Yahoo, she knew that a top priority had to be developing mobile
apps that consumers would make a part of their daily lives.
To try
to figure out what those apps should be, Mayer conducted a survey.
The
results made her laugh.
She
learned that after activities like calling people, texting, and maps, the main
things people do on their phones everyday are: check email, check weather, get
news, get stock quotes, check sports scores, get entertainment news, share
photos, communicate with groups, and ask questions.
What
made Mayer laugh was that those are all things people go to Yahoo for on the
Web. Yahoo's biggest products are Yahoo Mail, Yahoo News, Yahoo Finance, Yahoo
Sports, and so on.
At a
speech in New York in May 2013, Mayer said: "Yahoo has had the
functionality and content people want on their phones. Now we need to get it
into apps and the mobile web in a way people can really consume it on their
phones."
In her
first year at Yahoo, Mayer made two big moves to expand mobile reach and usage.
The
first move was to put a Yahoo executive named Adam Cahan in charge of a new
group called "Mobile and Emerging Products." Cahan came to Yahoo when
it acquired his mobile startup, IntoNow, for $20 million in 2011.
Yahoo
lacked the mobile talent to staff such a group, so Mayer spent $200 million at
the end of 2012 and through August of 2013 acquiring more than 20 mobile
startups. In almost every case, Yahoo would shut down the startup's product,
sign its engineering and product development people to two- and four-year
contracts, and integrate them into Cahan's team.
Mayer's
second big move to improve Yahoo's standing in mobile would turn out to be the
biggest transaction of her entire career. It would cost Yahoo $1.1 billion.
Could Mayer close the
deal?
On the
evening of Thursday, May 16, 2013, 26-year-old David Karp looked at his iPhone
and saw he had a voicemail from the chief operating officer of Facebook, Sheryl
Sandberg.
David
Karp, founder and CEO of Tumblr.
He
listened to her message. All Sandberg said was that she'd like Karp to call her
back.
But she
had said enough.
Karp,
the founder of a blog network called Tumblr, told his investment banker
Jonathan Turner at Qatalyst Partners about the voicemail.
They
decided they had to call Yahoo and let them know Sandberg had called.
That
day, All Things D reporter Kara Swisher and her colleague Peter Kafka had
reported that Yahoo was in serious talks to buy Tumblr.
Karp,
his board, and his bankers believed Sandberg was calling to see if the report
was true, and if Facebook could possibly join the bidding for Tumblr.
On the
one hand, a bidding war between Facebook and Yahoo would be great news for
Tumblr, its bankers, and its investors.
On the
other, Turner was terrified that the leak would spoil their deal. Mayer was
from Google, and Google was infamous for pulling the plug on deals if it felt
like the other side was trying to gin up interest in the press. Throughout
every stage of the slow courtship between the companies, Turner had been
paranoid about the press.
When
Sheryl Sandberg left a voicemail on David Karp's phone, it threatened to blow
up the deal.
After originally offering only $800 million to buy Tumblr, Yahoo
had finally upped its bid to $1.1 billion and was going through the final
stages of due diligence. The deal was basically done, and the Tumblr board
didn't think it was time to get greedy.
Still,
Yahoo had to be told about the voicemail. The companies had signed an
"exclusivity" agreement, which meant that Tumblr had to notify Yahoo
of any other approaches.
Turner
had nothing to worry about.
When
Mayer found out about Sandberg's voicemail, she only became more eager to get
the deal done.
She
went to her M&A team, led by "gruff" New Yorker Jackie Reses, and
told them to hurry up and wrap things up; she didn't want to lose out on Tumblr
— not after all those months of work and so many meetings with Karp.
Talks
between the two companies had begun in November 2012, when Karp went to
Sunnyvale and met with Mayer.
By
then, Tumblr, founded in 2007, had grown to an astounding 200 million worldwide
users a month, but Karp still hadn't figured out how the blog network could
make a lot of money off all those users.
He was
taking meetings on the West Coast to see if Google, Facebook, Microsoft, or
Yahoo wanted to make a strategic investment. He thought one of those companies
might want to sell ads on Tumblr.com and split the revenues.
That
first meeting between Karp and Mayer left both parties cold. Mayer mostly
talked about what she was trying to do at Yahoo, and a potential deal between
the two companies didn't really come up.
After
the meeting, Karp told his board and his bankers that the new CEO of Yahoo was
very nice, but that he didn't see a deal happening.
At
investment bank Qatalyst, Turner passed the news onto his boss, legendary tech
banker Frank Quattrone.
Quattrone
had gotten rich and powerful during the dot com bubble. He also got in some hot
water with the law, though he eventually extricated himself. He's brash. He's
got a mustache. He looks like the cartoon version of a deal-making,
back-slapping, investment banker. And yet, he's probably the best deal-maker in
the business.
Quattrone
thought he would be able to get Mayer more interested in Tumblr. So, in early
2013, he met with her, and pointed out that one of Tumblr's great strengths was
how popular it was on mobile devices. He accurately noted the incredible amount
of time young people were spending on Tumblr.
Quattrone
had said the magic word: "mobile."
Mayer
said she'd take a second look.
When
Marissa Mayer studies a topic, she doesn't do it superficially. After her
meeting with Quattrone, she spent an entire weekend using Tumblr, poking around
the site, and studying metrics.
Mayer
decided to get back in touch with Karp. Only, she didn't want to do an
advertising deal or make a strategic investment. She wanted to buy his company.
If that
was going to happen, it was going to take some doing. Karp didn't want to sell
his company. Facebook and Google had started trying to talk him into it, but he
refused, even though a sale would net him more than $100 million after taxes.
He wanted to keep control over his company.
Mario
Tama, Getty Images
"She
really took ownership of this, really persuaded David that she would let Tumblr
stay independent."
Mayer
realized she needed to put on a full-court press.
Mayer
flew to New York in February and had dinner with Karp and Jackie Reses on a
Saturday night. Mayer was able to win Karp over that night. She said that
Tumblr was an excellent product — an amazing tool for self-expression. She
noted that it was beating Facebook with younger consumers.
That
Saturday night, Mayer told Karp that she had a board meeting coming up soon,
and that she'd like to bring up the possibility of buying Tumblr.
Would
he be able to meet again that Sunday?
Karp
agreed to meet again. That Sunday night over dinner, Mayer talked about how the
new paradigm for tech acquisitions was for the acquiring company to allow the
acquired company to continue operating independently, as a subsidiary with its
own brand. She said that's what Google had done with YouTube, what Facebook had
done with Instagram, and it's what Yahoo would do with Tumblr.
They
stayed out till 2 a.m. Karp told Mayer to bring up the idea at her board
meeting.
During
her first-quarter board meeting, Mayer said she'd like to buy Tumblr. She said
Tumblr would, in a snap, improve Yahoo's position in mobile and make its
overall audience much younger. The board gave her full support to pursue the
deal.
Everything
went fine from there. The All Things D report and Sandberg's voicemail only
hurried the process along.
Finally,
over the next weekend, Karp and his board accepted Yahoo's offer.
It was
a triumph for Mayer and Yahoo.
For
years, Yahoo had tried to acquire hot startups that would help it become more
popular with users, and eventually begin growing its revenues again. But time
and again, the entrepreneurial ambitious types running hot startups would
refuse to sell to Yahoo, preferring to sell to Google or Facebook.
For
Mayer, the deal showed how far she'd come as an executive. Her penchant for
teacherly mentoring allowed her to cultivate a relationship with Karp and close
a deal that had seemed impossible.
One
source close to Tumblr's now defunct board said he was blown away by how much
effort Mayer put into the deal.
"Where
I give her high marks is that you don't typically get CEOs that engaged."
"She
really took ownership of this, really persuaded David that she would let Tumblr
stay independent.
"She
turned David around. He was very reluctant. He's not motivated by money in the
same way as the rest of us. He's really passionate about the product. His
concern about selling to Yahoo was that it would get subsumed.
"Marissa
convinced David that this wasn't the old Yahoo and that she's going to run it
differently."
Illustration
by Mike Nudelman
Now
into her second year as Yahoo CEO, Marissa Mayer from Wausau, Wisc., says
"I'm having the time of my life."
A
natural teacher, she has, in her 20s and 30s, turned that skill into the ability
to inspire thousands of people to make technology products that millions of
people use.
The
challenge she'll face in her 40s is: Can she become the rare, complete
technology CEO who can create magical products and deliver financial results?
By one measure,
Mayer did incredibly well during her first year. Since David Filo unrolled the
purple carpet for Marissa Mayer, Yahoo's stock has gone from $15.74 per share
to hovering around $28 in August 2013.
But,
while investor confidence in Mayer's vision and performance so far certainly
plays some role in the stock's magnificent surge, a much greater factor has
been Alibaba, the Chinese Internet company in which Yahoo is a part-owner.
Yahoo
has benefitted from Alibaba in two ways.
In the
months before Mayer joined Yahoo, CEO Scott Thompson and CFO Tim Morse hammered
out a deal in which Alibaba bought back a small portion of Yahoo's stake for
$7.6 billion. When he was still CEO, Thompson signaled that he would use that
money to buy back Yahoo shares, driving up their price. When she took over,
Mayer went along with this plan.
Because
of Alibaba, Yahoo has been able to spend billions of dollars buying its own
stock. With the supply of shares shrinking, and a few billion dollars-worth of
demand in the market, the shares have naturally risen.
The
other way Alibaba has helped Yahoo shares grow in value is by growing in value
itself.
Alibaba
has yet to go public. Because Yahoo still owns a large stake in Alibaba, it is
actually one of the few ways investors are able to place bets on it. Those bets
even have a pay-off date. As a part of the deal Thompson and Morse negotiated,
Yahoo will sell even more stock when Alibaba does finally IPO. Some analysts
think Yahoo will get another $7 billion in cash out of that deal.
Another
reason to be skeptical of Mayer's performance is that the person more
responsible than anyone else for her being the CEO of Yahoo, Third Point's Dan
Loeb, sold off most of his holdings in the company in July 2013. That month,
he, Michael Wolf, and Harry Wilson resigned from Yahoo's board, as their
settlement with the board required them to do if Third Point's stake in Yahoo
ever fell below 2 percent.
Third
Point remains a major Yahoo shareholder, but Loeb's liquidation is still a
strong signal that he thinks the upside from where Yahoo is now is more limited
than it was in 2012.
All
that said, there is no question that Mayer has drastically improved Yahoo in
her short time there so far.
You can
see it in the metrics. Yahoo claims that after Mayer's redesigns, traffic to
apps for Yahoo Mail is up 120 percent; Yahoo Weather, 150 percent; and Yahoo
News, 55 percent. In her first year, Mayer was able to keep traffic to Yahoo
Mail on the Web flat, and even slightly grow Yahoo.com. In an age where big
websites usually shrink because people check their email and news on their
phones, that's remarkable. In the middle of August 2013, ComScore reported that
Yahoo Web properties had passed Google properties as the most popular in the
United States.
Beyond
the metrics though, Mayer has revolutionized the culture at Yahoo.
One
Yahoo executive told me that before Mayer arrived, "what was missing was
leadership from the very top, which was able to cut to the chase and get some
tough decisions made, get focused in the right places, get the sense of
urgency, and also somebody who could really be the chief quality control leader
of the company."
And
indeed, the quality of Yahoo products has gone up since Mayer arrived. The
Yahoo Weather app that launched for iPhone in 2013 is stunning. Mayer's
redesign of Flickr is a delight.
Yes,
some people don't get along with her because of her direct, all-business style.
Sometimes
her brusque manner comes off as rude, "demeaning," or "stuck
up." It can insult people.
But
even some of those people say Yahoo has become a far more vibrant place under
her leadership.
One
person Mayer frequently clashed with at Yahoo told me, "You have to give
Marissa a lot of credit. Just because I don't like what she's done to me and I
don't like what she's done to many other people, doesn't mean I'm going to shy
away from giving her credit. She brought life back to Yahoo. There's no
question about it.
"The
Friday before she came on, the parking lots would be empty till 10 a.m. and
would be empty again after 4 p.m. That happened day after day after day for
seven months in a row. Marissa comes, the next week, the parking lots are full
at 8 a.m. and people are still there at 6:30.
"The
changes that she brought — making food free, focusing on quality, shutting some
things down, being open and honest during the Friday FYI meetings — all brought
belief back for a lot of people."
"If
she hadn't come in, all the smart people would have left.
"And
that would have been the end of Yahoo."
A Note on Sources
This
story is based primarily on first-hand reporting consisting of dozens of
interviews.
This
story would not exist if not for the cooperation of many people who did speak
with me, including those who grew up with Mayer, taught her, or worked with her
at Google and Yahoo. Some of these people are or were employed at Yahoo and
spoke to me at the risk of their careers. Many of these people spoke on a
not-for-attribution basis. Some spoke on the record. I have not identified many
on-the-record sources because I did not want to allow for the process of
elimination to identify others.
This
story, being told in a narrative fashion, does not identify the sources of
information for particular facts, including thoughts. I would caution readers
against assuming that because I have reported a person's thoughts, that person
is a direct source. A person will often share thoughts about pivotal moments in
their lives with a large group of people.
As a
part of the narrative, my story includes dialogue.
I am
grateful to James B. Stewart's "note on sources" at the end of his
book, "DisneyWar."
That note helped me think about how to describe my own sourcing. In his note,
Stewart describes how he sources dialogue. It's a perfect explanation, and I'd
like to quote it and use it as my own explanation.
"As
part of the narrative, I have included passages of dialogue. Dialogue— what
words were said— is a fact like any other. It is not necessarily a quotation
from an interview with me and I would discourage readers from inferring that
one or both of the speakers is a direct source. Especially in today's world of
instant communication, it is sometimes amazing how many people turn out to be
privy to what others may assume is a private conversation. Many of the
conversations reported in this book either took place before an audience or
became known to a wide circle of people, often within minutes of their taking
place. ... In a few cases other people were listening in on speakerphones,
extensions, or overheard conversations without one or both of the speakers'
knowledge. Readers should bear in mind that, given the vagaries of human
memory, remembered dialogue is rarely the same as actual recordings and
transcripts. At the same time, it is no more nor less accurate than many other
recollections."
---
Bibliography
---
---
Acknowledgments
---
I'm
grateful to Jay Yarow and Alyson Shontell for reading this story and suggesting
edits. Jill Klausen and Liz Wilke saved me with wonderful copy edits. Mike
Nudelman contributed excellent illustrations that bring the story to life. I'm
grateful to people in California, Wisconsin, and around the world who took my
calls and agreed to talk.
No comments: